These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20040556)
1. Strength of study evidence examined by the FDA in premarket approval of cardiovascular devices. Dhruva SS; Bero LA; Redberg RF JAMA; 2009 Dec; 302(24):2679-85. PubMed ID: 20040556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characteristics of Clinical Studies Conducted Over the Total Product Life Cycle of High-Risk Therapeutic Medical Devices Receiving FDA Premarket Approval in 2010 and 2011. Rathi VK; Krumholz HM; Masoudi FA; Ross JS JAMA; 2015 Aug; 314(6):604-12. PubMed ID: 26262798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Premarket clinical evaluation of novel cardiovascular devices: quality analysis of premarket clinical studies submitted to the Food and Drug Administration 2000-2007. Kramer DB; Mallis E; Zuckerman BD; Zimmerman BA; Maisel WH Am J Ther; 2010; 17(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 20038828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Selective reporting in trials of high risk cardiovascular devices: cross sectional comparison between premarket approval summaries and published reports. Chang L; Dhruva SS; Chu J; Bero LA; Redberg RF BMJ; 2015 Jun; 350():h2613. PubMed ID: 26063311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characteristics of Clinical Studies Used for US Food and Drug Administration Approval of High-Risk Medical Device Supplements. Zheng SY; Dhruva SS; Redberg RF JAMA; 2017 Aug; 318(7):619-625. PubMed ID: 28810022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How do Orthopaedic Devices Change After Their Initial FDA Premarket Approval? Samuel AM; Rathi VK; Grauer JN; Ross JS Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Apr; 474(4):1053-68. PubMed ID: 26584802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical Evidence Supporting US Food and Drug Administration Premarket Approval of High-Risk Otolaryngologic Devices, 2000-2014. Rathi VK; Wang B; Ross JS; Downing NS; Kesselheim AS; Gray ST Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Feb; 156(2):285-288. PubMed ID: 28093943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gender bias in studies for Food and Drug Administration premarket approval of cardiovascular devices. Dhruva SS; Bero LA; Redberg RF Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2011 Mar; 4(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 21364127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. FDA approval of cardiac implantable electronic devices via original and supplement premarket approval pathways, 1979-2012. Rome BN; Kramer DB; Kesselheim AS JAMA; 2014 Jan 22-29; 311(4):385-91. PubMed ID: 24449317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incremental Revisions across the Life Span of Ophthalmic Devices after Initial Food and Drug Administration Premarket Approval, 1979-2015. Gopal AD; Rathi VK; Teng CC; Del Priore L; Ross JS Ophthalmology; 2017 Aug; 124(8):1237-1246. PubMed ID: 28501378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk of Recall Among Medical Devices Undergoing US Food and Drug Administration 510(k) Clearance and Premarket Approval, 2008-2017. Dubin JR; Simon SD; Norrell K; Perera J; Gowen J; Cil A JAMA Netw Open; 2021 May; 4(5):e217274. PubMed ID: 33956132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiological Medical Device Innovation: Approvals via the Premarket Approval Pathway From 2000 to 2015. Ghobadi CW; Hayman EL; Finkle JH; Walter JR; Xu S J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 Jan; 14(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 28061962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Approval of high-risk medical devices in the US: implications for clinical cardiology. Rome BN; Kramer DB; Kesselheim AS Curr Cardiol Rep; 2014; 16(6):489. PubMed ID: 24760423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical device recalls and the FDA approval process. Zuckerman DM; Brown P; Nissen SE Arch Intern Med; 2011 Jun; 171(11):1006-11. PubMed ID: 21321283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. US Food and Drug Administration Clearance of Moderate-Risk Otolaryngologic Devices via the 510(k) Process, 1997-2016. Rathi VK; Gadkaree SK; Ross JS; Kozin ED; Sethi RK; Naunheim MR; Puram SV; Gray ST Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Oct; 157(4):608-617. PubMed ID: 28786317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Postmarket Modifications of High-Risk Therapeutic Devices in Otolaryngology Cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration. Rathi VK; Ross JS; Samuel AM; Mehra S Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Sep; 153(3):400-8. PubMed ID: 26044785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. US FDA Advisory Panel Members' Assessment of Premarket Approval Process and Suggestions for Improvement. Alam M; Shi VJ; Maisel-Campbell A; Cressey BD; Nadir U; Koza E; Haq M; Ahmed A; Ma MS; Weil A; Cahn BA; Lee AY; Shapiro S; Poon E JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Oct; 7(10):e2436066. PubMed ID: 39382899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spinal devices in the United States-investigational device exemption trials and premarket approval of class III devices. Golish SR; Reed ML Spine J; 2017 Jan; 17(1):150-157. PubMed ID: 27737804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantification of US Food and Drug Administration Premarket Approval Statements for High-Risk Medical Devices With Pediatric Age Indications. Lee SJ; Cho L; Klang E; Wall J; Rensi S; Glicksberg BS JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Jun; 4(6):e2112562. PubMed ID: 34156454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An overview of Food and Drug Administration regulation of drugs, biologics, and devices to be used for management of periodontal diseases. Tylenda CA; Weintraub M Ann Periodontol; 1997 Mar; 2(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 9151539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]