These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2004140)

  • 1. Preventing fraud.
    Smith J
    BMJ; 1991 Feb; 302(6773):362-3. PubMed ID: 2004140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fraud and misconduct in medical research. Causes, investigation and prevention. A report of the Royal College of Physicians.
    J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1991 Apr; 25(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 2066936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. UK royal college responds to scientific fraud.
    Ramsay S
    Lancet; 1995 Jun; 345(8964):1566. PubMed ID: 11657385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Was the paper I wrote a fraud?
    Bowie C
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1755-6. PubMed ID: 11682718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lessons from the Pearce affair: handling scientific fraud.
    Lock S
    BMJ; 1995 Jun; 310(6994):1547-8. PubMed ID: 7787632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Research fraud: discouraging the others.
    Lock S
    BMJ; 1990 Dec; 301(6765):1348. PubMed ID: 11642809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fraud and misconduct in medical research.
    Lock S
    Med Leg J; 1996; 64 ( Pt 4)():139-52. PubMed ID: 9050300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. UK fraud verdict prompts moves on ethics..
    Abdulla S
    Nature; 1995 Jun; 375(6532):529. PubMed ID: 7791862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preventing fraud.
    Thomas G
    BMJ; 1991 Mar; 302(6777):660. PubMed ID: 2012891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. Deception: difficulties and initiatives.
    Chantler C; Chantler S
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1731-2. PubMed ID: 9652923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time to face up to research misconduct.
    Smith R
    BMJ; 1996 Mar; 312(7034):789-90. PubMed ID: 8608272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Publication ethics and the research assessment exercise: reflections on the troubled question of authorship.
    Sheikh A
    J Med Ethics; 2000 Dec; 26(6):422-6. PubMed ID: 11129840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Commentary: monitoring biological data.
    Kritchevsky D
    Account Res; 1990 Oct; 1(2):85-6. PubMed ID: 15991407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fraud and misconduct in clinical research.
    Wells F
    Account Res; 1997; 5(1-3):25-38. PubMed ID: 11654814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. GMC gets tough with fraudulent doctors.
    Dillner L
    BMJ; 1991 Dec; 303(6816):1493. PubMed ID: 11642956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fraud and misconduct in clinical research: is it prejudicial to patient safety?
    Wells F
    Adverse Drug React Acute Poisoning Rev; 1992; 11(4):241-55. PubMed ID: 11652183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medical council to investigate alleged research fraud.
    Dyer O
    BMJ; 2002 Sep; 325(7363):509. PubMed ID: 12217981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lies, damned lies, and science -- BBC2 Horizon: "The Betrayers," 13 Mar 1995.
    Wilmshurst P
    BMJ; 1995 Mar; 310(6981):747. PubMed ID: 11644676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. Conduct unbecoming--the MRC's approach.
    Evans I
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1728-9. PubMed ID: 9652921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Many journals have not retracted "fraudulent" research.
    Cooper-Mahkorn D
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7148):1850. PubMed ID: 11645074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.