These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20041920)

  • 1. The National Bowel Cancer Audit: the risks and benefits of moving to open reporting of clinical outcomes.
    Thompson MR; Tekkis PP; Stamatakis J; Smith JJ; Wood LF; von Hildebrand M; Poloniecki JD
    Colorectal Dis; 2010 Aug; 12(8):783-91. PubMed ID: 20041920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response to Thompson et al.: National Bowel Cancer Audit.
    Almoudaris A; Faiz O
    Colorectal Dis; 2010 Sep; 12(9):948-50. PubMed ID: 20184640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The national bowel cancer audit project: the impact of organisational structure on outcome in operative bowel cancer within the United Kingdom.
    Cornish JA; Tekkis PP; Tan E; Tilney HS; Thompson MR; Smith JJ
    Surg Oncol; 2011 Jun; 20(2):e72-7. PubMed ID: 21071208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. National audit of the sensitivity of double-contrast barium enema for colorectal carcinoma, using control charts For the Royal College of Radiologists Clinical Radiology Audit Sub-Committee.
    Tawn DJ; Squire CJ; Mohammed MA; Adam EJ
    Clin Radiol; 2005 May; 60(5):558-64. PubMed ID: 15851043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The National Bowel Cancer Audit Project: what do trusts think of the National Bowel Cancer Audit and how can it be improved?
    Cornish JA; Tilney HS; Tan E; Thompson MR; Smith JJ; Tekkis PP
    Tech Coloproctol; 2011 Mar; 15(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 21287225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How are we doing in reviewing those new patients who need to be seen as early as possible? An audit of 264 consecutive new patients seen over 6 months in a university hospital in Ireland.
    Haroon M; Bond U; Phelan M; Regan M
    J Rheumatol; 2009 Feb; 36(2):454-5; author reply 455. PubMed ID: 19208581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical audit: still an important tool for improving healthcare.
    Paton JY; Ranmal R; Dudley J;
    Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed; 2015 Apr; 100(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 25122156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Barriers to conducting effective obstetric audit in Ifakara: a qualitative assessment in an under-resourced setting in Tanzania.
    van Hamersveld KT; den Bakker E; Nyamtema AS; van den Akker T; Mfinanga EH; van Elteren M; van Roosmalen J
    Trop Med Int Health; 2012 May; 17(5):652-7. PubMed ID: 22469464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Twenty-five years of the trauma audit and research network: a continuing evolution to drive improvement.
    Lecky F
    Emerg Med J; 2015 Dec; 32(12):906-8. PubMed ID: 26598627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving quality of care in inflammatory bowel disease: what changes can be made today?
    Panés J; O'Connor M; Peyrin-Biroulet L; Irving P; Petersson J; Colombel JF
    J Crohns Colitis; 2014 Sep; 8(9):919-26. PubMed ID: 24713174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proposed standards for the design and conduct of a national clinical audit or quality improvement study.
    Dixon N
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2013 Sep; 25(4):357-65. PubMed ID: 23696581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Judging the quality of clinical audit by general practitioners: a pilot study comparing the assessments of medical peers and NHS audit specialists.
    Bowie P; McKay J; Murray L; Lough M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Dec; 14(6):1038-43. PubMed ID: 19019097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Centralized medical monitoring in phase III clinical trials: the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) experience.
    Soran A; Nesbitt L; Mamounas EP; Lembersky B; Bryant J; Anderson S; Brown A; Passarello M
    Clin Trials; 2006; 3(5):478-85. PubMed ID: 17060221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The UK National Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Resources and Outcomes Project--a feasibility study of large-scale clinical service peer review.
    Roberts CM; Buckingham RJ; Stone RA; Lowe D; Pearson MG
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2010 Oct; 16(5):927-32. PubMed ID: 20557406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective study of the practical issues of local involvement in national audit of COPD.
    Roberts CM; Lowe D; Barnes S; Pearson MG
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2004 May; 10(2):281-90. PubMed ID: 15189393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surgical audit: a review. Proceedings of an audit symposium.
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1989 Nov; 71(6 Suppl):87-9. PubMed ID: 2610473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The challenges of clinical governance: "informationalising" as socio-technical literacy.
    Iedema R
    Health Inf Manag; 2004; 33(4):109-11. PubMed ID: 18239229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In pursuit of quality: the National Institute for Clinical Excellence.
    Rawlins M
    Lancet; 1999 Mar; 353(9158):1079-82. PubMed ID: 10199366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methodological issues in the use of guidelines and audit to improve clinical effectiveness in breast cancer in one United Kingdom health region.
    Bell CM; Ma M; Campbell S; Basnett I; Pollock A; Taylor I
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2000 Mar; 26(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 10744929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating instruments for regulation of health care in the Netherlands.
    Tuijn SM; Robben PB; Janssens FJ; van den Bergh H
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2011 Jun; 17(3):411-9. PubMed ID: 21338445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.