270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20042662)
1. Biomechanical properties of keratoconus suspect eyes.
Saad A; Lteif Y; Azan E; Gatinel D
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jun; 51(6):2912-6. PubMed ID: 20042662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening of forme fruste keratoconus with the ocular response analyzer.
Schweitzer C; Roberts CJ; Mahmoud AM; Colin J; Maurice-Tison S; Kerautret J
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 May; 51(5):2403-10. PubMed ID: 19907025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment parameters in mild keratoconus.
Fontes BM; Ambrósio R; Jardim D; Velarde GC; Nosé W
Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):673-9. PubMed ID: 20138369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes.
Ortiz D; Piñero D; Shabayek MH; Arnalich-Montiel F; Alió JL
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Aug; 33(8):1371-5. PubMed ID: 17662426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical evaluation of cornea in topographically normal relatives of patients with keratoconus.
Kara N; Altinkaynak H; Baz O; Goker Y
Cornea; 2013 Mar; 32(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 22677642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The relationship between corneal biomechanical properties and confocal microscopy findings in normal and keratoconic eyes.
Hurmeric V; Sahin A; Ozge G; Bayer A
Cornea; 2010 Jun; 29(6):641-9. PubMed ID: 20458238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early biomechanical keratoconus pattern measured with an ocular response analyzer: curve analysis.
Touboul D; Bénard A; Mahmoud AM; Gallois A; Colin J; Roberts CJ
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Dec; 37(12):2144-50. PubMed ID: 21978610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can we measure corneal biomechanical changes after collagen cross-linking in eyes with keratoconus?--a pilot study.
Goldich Y; Barkana Y; Morad Y; Hartstein M; Avni I; Zadok D
Cornea; 2009 Jun; 28(5):498-502. PubMed ID: 19421050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved keratoconus detection by ocular response analyzer testing after consideration of corneal thickness as a confounding factor.
Galletti JG; Pförtner T; Bonthoux FF
J Refract Surg; 2012 Mar; 28(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 22230059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Corneal hysteresis, corneal resistance factor, and intraocular pressure measurement in patients with scleroderma using the reichert ocular response analyzer.
Emre S; Kayikçioğlu O; Ateş H; Cinar E; Inceoğlu N; Yargucu F; Pirildar T; Oksel F
Cornea; 2010 Jun; 29(6):628-31. PubMed ID: 20458219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Corneal biomechanics, refraction, and corneal aberrometry in keratoconus: an integrated study.
Piñero DP; Alio JL; Barraquer RI; Michael R; Jiménez R
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Apr; 51(4):1948-55. PubMed ID: 19907021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Graft biomechanical properties after penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus.
Feizi S; Einollahi B; Yazdani S; Hashemloo A
Cornea; 2012 Aug; 31(8):855-8. PubMed ID: 22357385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ocular response analyzer measurements in keratoconus with normal central corneal thickness compared with matched normal control eyes.
Fontes BM; Ambrósio R; Velarde GC; Nosé W
J Refract Surg; 2011 Mar; 27(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 20481414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical and morphological corneal response to placement of intrastromal corneal ring segments for keratoconus.
Dauwe C; Touboul D; Roberts CJ; Mahmoud AM; Kérautret J; Fournier P; Malecaze F; Colin J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1761-7. PubMed ID: 19781473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vivo biomechanical changes after corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: 1-year analysis of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial.
Greenstein SA; Fry KL; Hersh PS
Cornea; 2012 Jan; 31(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 21993470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of corneal biomechanics in pre and post-refractive surgery and keratoconic eyes by Ocular Response Analyser.
Shah S; Laiquzzaman M
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2009 Jun; 32(3):129-32; quiz 151. PubMed ID: 19233712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes of corneal biomechanics with keratoconus.
Wolffsohn JS; Safeen S; Shah S; Laiquzzaman M
Cornea; 2012 Aug; 31(8):849-54. PubMed ID: 22495031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combining ocular response analyzer metrics for corneal biomechanical diagnosis.
Ruiseñor Vázquez PR; Delrivo M; Bonthoux FF; Pförtner T; Galletti JG
J Refract Surg; 2013 Sep; 29(9):596-602. PubMed ID: 23848186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Second-generation corneal deformation signal waveform analysis in normal, forme fruste keratoconic, and manifest keratoconic corneas after statistical correction for potentially confounding factors.
Zhang L; Danesh J; Tannan A; Phan V; Yu F; Hamilton DR
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2196-204. PubMed ID: 26703296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ectatic disorders associated with a claw-shaped pattern on corneal topography.
Lee BW; Jurkunas UV; Harissi-Dagher M; Poothullil AM; Tobaigy FM; Azar DT
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jul; 144(1):154-156. PubMed ID: 17601448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
