160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20042741)
1. Finite element analysis of a TMJ implant.
Kashi A; Chowdhury AR; Saha S
J Dent Res; 2010 Mar; 89(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 20042741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of bone quality on the artificial temporomandibular joint condylar prosthesis.
Hsu JT; Huang HL; Tu MG; Fuh LJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jun; 109(6):e1-5. PubMed ID: 20451824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stress distribution in the temporomandibular joint after mandibular protraction: a 3-dimensional finite element study. Part 2.
Gupta A; Hazarey PV; Kharbanda OP; Kohli VS; Gunjal A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):749-56. PubMed ID: 19524834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The possibilities of uncemented glenoid component--a finite element study.
Gupta S; van der Helm FC; van Keulen F
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Mar; 19(3):292-302. PubMed ID: 15003345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of screw fixation on temporomandibular joint condylar prosthesis.
Hsu JT; Huang HL; Tsai MT; Fuh LJ; Tu MG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 May; 69(5):1320-8. PubMed ID: 21216062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selection of the implant transgingival height for optimal biomechanical properties: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Sun Y; Kong L; Hu K; Xie C; Zhou H; Liu Y; Liu B
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 47(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 18977057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finite element stress analysis of cuneiform and cylindrical threaded implant geometries.
Cruz M; Lourenço AF; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; de Castro Lemonge AC; Wassall T
Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):421-38. PubMed ID: 17065763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of stress distributions for different surgical procedures, screw dimensions and orientations for a Temporomandibular joint implant.
Chowdhury AR; Kashi A; Saha S
J Biomech; 2011 Sep; 44(14):2584-7. PubMed ID: 21816398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of dental implants as orthodontic anchorage.
Gallas MM; Abeleira MT; Fernández JR; Burguera M
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Feb; 27(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 15743858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Kong L; Hu K; Li D; Song Y; Yang J; Wu Z; Liu B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 18416414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of a thin HA coating on the stress/strain distribution in bone around dental implants using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Aoki H; Ozeki K; Ohtani Y; Fukui Y; Asaoka T
Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(3):157-69. PubMed ID: 16518015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Straight, semi-anatomic and anatomic TMJ implants: the influence of condylar geometry and bone fixation screws.
Ramos A; Completo A; Relvas C; Mesnard M; Simões JA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 39(5):343-50. PubMed ID: 20801667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in the mandible: a finite element study.
Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):866-76. PubMed ID: 19865627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Selection of the distraction implant length with improved biomechanical properties by three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Gao J; Li T; Hou XC; Wang Z; Kong L; Chen JH
J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Apr; 38(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 20819137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finite element analysis for interfacial stress and fatigue behaviors of biomimetic titanium implant under static and dynamic loading conditions.
Chen L; Guo X; Li Y; Li T
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Jul; 35(7):662-72. PubMed ID: 20693706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
