These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20042929)

  • 61. Diagnosis related groups in Europe: moving towards transparency, efficiency, and quality in hospitals?
    Busse R; Geissler A; Aaviksoo A; Cots F; Häkkinen U; Kobel C; Mateus C; Or Z; O'Reilly J; Serdén L; Street A; Tan SS; Quentin W
    BMJ; 2013 Jun; 346():f3197. PubMed ID: 23747967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The impact of diagnosis related group payment on the performance of public hospitals.
    Ma Y; Wang W
    Am J Transl Res; 2021; 13(6):6796-6801. PubMed ID: 34306429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. [Why are diagnosis-related groups unpopular in Colombia?].
    Gorbanev I; Cortés A; Agudelo S; Yepes FJ
    Cad Saude Publica; 2015 Sep; 31(9):2027-31. PubMed ID: 26578026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Paying for the quantity and quality of hospital care: the foundations and evolution of payment policy in England.
    Grašič K; Mason AR; Street A
    Health Econ Rev; 2015 Dec; 5(1):50. PubMed ID: 26062538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Expanding roles of hospital epidemiology: severity of illness indicators.
    Gross PA
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 1989 Jun; 10(6):257-60. PubMed ID: 2500479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. [The importance of the data quality in the validation of the ACG case mix. Ambulatory care groups].
    Orueta JF; López de Munain J; Grandes G
    Aten Primaria; 1998 Jun; 22(2):128. PubMed ID: 9717358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Developing a model for predicting hospital resource consumption.
    Scherubel JC; Swartz JA
    NLN Publ; 1987 Dec; (20-2191):131-43. PubMed ID: 3122165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. [Novel dynamic TOPSIS method in evaluation for quality of medical care].
    Wang Y; Ren L; Sun Z
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2012 Oct; 37(10):1071-6. PubMed ID: 23117462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Commentary: Nudging hospitals to better quality.
    Charlesworth A; Dixon J
    BMJ; 2013 Jun; 346():f3344. PubMed ID: 23747968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. MRSA: The Private-Sector Response.
    Jackson V; Nash DB
    Biotechnol Healthc; 2008 May; 5(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 22478702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Hospital payment systems based on diagnosis-related groups: experiences in low- and middle-income countries.
    Mathauer I; Wittenbecher F
    Bull World Health Organ; 2013 Oct; 91(10):746-756A. PubMed ID: 24115798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Systematically evaluating the impact of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) on health care delivery: a matrix of ethical implications.
    Fourie C; Biller-Andorno N; Wild V
    Health Policy; 2014 Apr; 115(2-3):157-64. PubMed ID: 24388050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. After the revolution: DRGs at age 30.
    Quinn K
    Ann Intern Med; 2014 Mar; 160(6):426-9. PubMed ID: 24723081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Diagnosis-related Groups and Hospital Inpatient Federal Reimbursement.
    Rimler SB; Gale BD; Reede DL
    Radiographics; 2015 Oct; 35(6):1825-34. PubMed ID: 26466189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Hospital payment based on diagnosis-related groups differs in Europe and holds lessons for the United States.
    Quentin W; Scheller-Kreinsen D; Blümel M; Geissler A; Busse R
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2013 Apr; 32(4):713-23. PubMed ID: 23569051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Trends in Diagnosis Related Groups for Inpatient Admissions and Associated Changes in Payment From 2012 to 2016.
    Gluckman TJ; Spinelli KJ; Wang M; Yazdani A; Grunkemeier G; Bradley SM; Wasfy JH; Goyal A; Oseran A; Joynt Maddox KE
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Dec; 3(12):e2028470. PubMed ID: 33284340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Australian diagnosis related groups: Drivers of complexity adjustment.
    Jackson T; Dimitropoulos V; Madden R; Gillett S
    Health Policy; 2015 Nov; 119(11):1433-41. PubMed ID: 26521013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. [Using diagnosis-related groups in Chile: lessons and challengesLições e desafios do uso de grupos de diagnósticos relacionados no Chile].
    Cid C; Dawson N; Medina C; Espinoza A; Bastías G
    Rev Panam Salud Publica; 2024; 48():e67. PubMed ID: 39247390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Unraveling the effects of DIP payment reform on inpatient healthcare: insights into impacts and challenges.
    Zhang Y; Xu SY; Tan GM
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2024 Aug; 24(1):887. PubMed ID: 39097710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Evaluating the effect of health insurance reform on health equity and financial protection for elderly in low- and middle-income countries: evidences from China.
    Wang H; Xiang X
    Global Health; 2024 Jul; 20(1):57. PubMed ID: 39080662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.