203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20043160)
1. Simultaneous augmentation and periareolar mastopexy: selecting the correct implant.
Rancati A; Nava M; Tessari L
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Feb; 34(1):33-9; discussion 40-1. PubMed ID: 20043160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction.
Spear SL; Pelletiere CV; Menon N
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 15529204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective study comparing two brands of cohesive gel breast implants with anatomic shape: 5-year follow-up evaluation.
Niechajev I; Jurell G; Lohjelm L
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007; 31(6):697-710. PubMed ID: 17653683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. "Tear-drop augmentation mastopexy": a technique to augment superior pole hollow.
Ceydeli A; Freund RM
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2003; 27(6):425-32; discussion 433. PubMed ID: 14994167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maximizing the use of precapsular space and the choice of implant type in breast augmentation mammaplasty revisions: review of 49 consecutive procedures and patient satisfaction assessment.
Castello MF; Lazzeri D; Silvestri A; Agostini T; Pascone C; Marcelli C; Gigliotti D; D'Aniello C; Gasparotti M
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):828-38. PubMed ID: 21455821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Serologic and histologic findings in patients with capsular contracture after breast augmentation with smooth silicone gel implants: is serum hyaluronan a potential predictor?
Prantl L; Pöppl N; Horvat N; Heine N; Eisenmann-Klein M
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2005; 29(6):510-8. PubMed ID: 16328636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conservative augmentation with periareolar mastopexy reduces complications and treats a variety of breast types: a 5-year retrospective review of 100 consecutive patients.
Cannon CL; Lindsey JT
Ann Plast Surg; 2010 May; 64(5):516-21. PubMed ID: 20395815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast augmentation with extra-projected and high-cohesive Dual-Gel Prosthesis 510: a prospective study of 75 consecutive cases for a new method (the Zenith system).
Riggio E
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):866-78. PubMed ID: 22484397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simultaneous augmentation mastopexy: a technique for maximum en bloc skin resection using the inverted-T pattern regardless of implant size, asymmetry, or ptosis.
Eisenberg T
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Apr; 36(2):349-54. PubMed ID: 21853404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast augmentation, antibiotic prophylaxis, and infection: comparative analysis of 1,628 primary augmentation mammoplasties assessing the role and efficacy of antibiotics prophylaxis duration.
Khan UD
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Feb; 34(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 19841968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The owl technique combined with the inferior pedicle in mastopexy.
Loustau HD; Mayer HF; Sarrabayrouse M
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2008 Jan; 32(1):11-5; discussion 16-7. PubMed ID: 17851712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Congenital breast deformity is a serious handicap. An important indication for breast reconstruction with silicone implants].
Wieslander JB
Lakartidningen; 1999 Apr; 96(14):1703-5, 1708-10. PubMed ID: 10222685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Histological and immunohistochemical investigations with capsular contracture after breast augmentation with smooth silicone gel implants].
Prantl L; Schreml S; Fichtner-Feigl S; Pöppl N; Roll C; Eisenmann-Klein M; Hofstädter F
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2006 Aug; 38(4):224-32. PubMed ID: 16991042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of Macrotextured Shaped Extra Full Projection Cohesive Gel Implants in Primary Aesthetic Breast Augmentation.
Montemurro P; Cheema M; Hedén P; Ferri M; Quattrini Li A; Avvedimento S
Aesthet Surg J; 2017 Apr; 37(4):408-418. PubMed ID: 27836857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preliminary (3 years) experience with smooth wall silicone gel implants for primary breast augmentation.
Seify H; Sullivan K; Hester TR
Ann Plast Surg; 2005 Mar; 54(3):231-5; discussion 235. PubMed ID: 15725819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type.
Namnoum JD; Largent J; Kaplan HM; Oefelein MG; Brown MH
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1165-72. PubMed ID: 23664574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases and matrix metalloproteinases on capsular formation around smooth and textured silicone gel implants.
Ulrich D; Ulrich F; Pallua N; Eisenmann-Klein M
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Jul; 33(4):555-62. PubMed ID: 19330370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Unsatisfactory results of periareolar mastopexy with or without augmentation and reduction mammoplasty: enlarged areola with flattened nipple.
Baran CN; Peker F; Ortak T; Sensöz O; Baran NK
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2001; 25(4):286-9. PubMed ID: 11568833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Double breast contour in primary aesthetic breast augmentation: incidence, prevention and treatment.
Médard de Chardon V; Balaguer T; Chignon-Sicard B; Lebreton E
Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Apr; 64(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 20224340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Approaching revisional surgery in augmentation and mastopexy/augmentation patients.
Dickinson BP; Handel N
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Jan; 68(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 21587043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]