BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20043547)

  • 21. In-vivo prospective comparison of bond failure rates of 2 self-etching primer/adhesive systems.
    Pasquale A; Weinstein M; Borislow AJ; Braitman LE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):671-4. PubMed ID: 18005842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of a new nano-filled restorative material for bonding orthodontic brackets.
    Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Soliman MM; Oonsombat C; Laffoon JF; Warren J
    World J Orthod; 2007; 8(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 17373220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In-vitro fluoride release rates from 9 orthodontic bonding adhesives.
    Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Tagliani P; Klersy C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 18005840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In vivo evaluation of two new moisture-resistant orthodontic adhesive systems: a comparative clinical trial.
    Mavropoulos A; Karamouzos A; Kolokithas G; Athanasiou AE
    J Orthod; 2003 Jun; 30(2):139-47; discussion 127-8. PubMed ID: 12835430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of etchants and primers on shear bond strength of a self-ligating esthetic orthodontic bracket.
    Chalgren R; Combe EC; Wahl AJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):577.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18005827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A new generation of self-etching adhesives: comparison with traditional acid etch technique.
    Holzmeier M; Schaubmayr M; Dasch W; Hirschfelder U
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Mar; 69(2):78-93. PubMed ID: 18385954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of slot sizes in self-ligating brackets using electron microscopy.
    Bhalla NB; Good SA; McDonald F; Sherriff M; Cash AC
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 20575198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An ex vivo assessment of gingivally offset lower premolar brackets.
    Thind BS; Larmour CJ; Stirrups DR; Lloyd CH
    J Orthod; 2004 Mar; 31(1):34-40; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 15071150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparative evaluation of bracket bonding with 1-, 2-, and 3-component adhesive systems.
    Faltermeier A; Behr M; Müssig D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Aug; 132(2):144.e1-5. PubMed ID: 17693360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of the shear-peel and third-order bond strengths of orthodontic brackets with 2 etch techniques and the role of bracket asymmetry.
    Gibb AJ; Katona TR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):699.e1-7. PubMed ID: 17169729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of changing crosshead speed on the shear bond strength of orthodontic bonding adhesive.
    Shooter KJ; Griffin MP; Kerr B
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 May; 28(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 22866593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A randomised clinical trial to investigate bond failure rates using a self-etching primer.
    Murfitt PG; Quick AN; Swain MV; Herbison GP
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Oct; 28(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 16763088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A 5-year clinical review of bond failure with a light-cured resin adhesive.
    Millett DT; Hallgren A; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; Robertson M; Love J
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Aug; 68(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 9709836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A randomized control clinical trial investigating orthodontic bond failure rates when using Orthosolo universal bond enhancer compared to a conventional bonding primer.
    Wenger NA; Deacon S; Harradine NW
    J Orthod; 2008 Mar; 35(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 18287392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Torque expression of self-ligating brackets.
    Badawi HM; Toogood RW; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):721-8. PubMed ID: 18456146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of blood and saliva contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with 4 adhesives.
    Oztoprak MO; Isik F; Sayinsu K; Arun T; Aydemir B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Feb; 131(2):238-42. PubMed ID: 17276865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of in vivo aging on the shear bond strength of an orthodontic adhesive.
    Chatzistavrou E; Eliades T; Zinelis S; Athanasiou AE; Eliades G
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 20043546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A retrospective six-months clinical trial of adhesive precoated brackets and bonding system.
    Oliver B; Dama M
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1997 Feb; 63(2):101-3, 107. PubMed ID: 9046727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical comparison of an adhesive precoated vs. an uncoated ceramic bracket system.
    Verstrynge A; Ghesquiere A; Willems G
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2004 Feb; 7(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 14989750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An in vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement and a composite adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets.
    Movahhed HZ; Ogaard B; Syverud M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Oct; 27(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 16043469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.