These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20045169)

  • 21. Biomass adaptation to complex substrate degradation in membrane bioreactors: appropriated operating conditions.
    Sridang PC; Lobos J; Pottier A; Wisniewski C; Grasmick A
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 18192738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Performance of a membrane bioreactor used for the treatment of wastewater contaminated with heavy metals.
    Katsou E; Malamis S; Loizidou M
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Mar; 102(6):4325-32. PubMed ID: 21269823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of disintegrated sludge recycling on membrane permeability in a membrane bioreactor combined with a turbulent jet flow ozone contactor.
    Hwang BK; Kim JH; Ahn CH; Lee CH; Song JY; Ra YH
    Water Res; 2010 Mar; 44(6):1833-40. PubMed ID: 20092865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Occurrence and removal of microbial indicators from municipal wastewaters by nine different MBR systems.
    Hirani ZM; Decarolis JF; Lehman G; Adham SS; Jacangelo JG
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(4):865-71. PubMed ID: 22766879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Biomass characteristics of two types of submerged membrane bioreactors for nitrogen removal from wastewater.
    Liang Z; Das A; Beerman D; Hu Z
    Water Res; 2010 Jun; 44(11):3313-20. PubMed ID: 20371094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of sulfonated and other micropollutants removal in membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment.
    De Wever H; Weiss S; Reemtsma T; Vereecken J; Müller J; Knepper T; Rörden O; Gonzalez S; Barcelo D; Dolores Hernando M
    Water Res; 2007 Feb; 41(4):935-45. PubMed ID: 17207834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Feasibility study of moving-fiber biofilm membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment: process control.
    Phattaranawik J; Leiknes T
    Water Res; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2227-34. PubMed ID: 21324506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Performance and fouling characteristics of different pore-sized submerged ceramic membrane bioreactors (SCMBR).
    Jin L; Ng HY; Ong SL
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(11):2213-8. PubMed ID: 19494461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of operational conditions on the performance of a mesh filter activated sludge process.
    Fuchs W; Resch C; Kernstock M; Mayer M; Schoeberl P; Braun R
    Water Res; 2005 Mar; 39(5):803-10. PubMed ID: 15743625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Relation between EPS adherence, viscoelastic properties, and MBR operation: Biofouling study with QCM-D.
    Sweity A; Ying W; Ali-Shtayeh MS; Yang F; Bick A; Oron G; Herzberg M
    Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(19):6430-40. PubMed ID: 22014563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Performances of a hybrid adsorption/submerged membrane biological process for toxic waste removal.
    Lesage N; Spérandio M; Cabassud C
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):173-80. PubMed ID: 16003976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Occurrence of benzothiazoles in municipal wastewater and their fate in biological treatment.
    Kloepfer A; Gnirss R; Jekel M; Reemtsma T
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(5):203-8. PubMed ID: 15497849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Enhanced performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor with powdered activated carbon addition for municipal secondary effluent treatment.
    Lin H; Wang F; Ding L; Hong H; Chen J; Lu X
    J Hazard Mater; 2011 Sep; 192(3):1509-14. PubMed ID: 21794980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Performance of suspended and attached growth MBR systems in treating high strength synthetic wastewater.
    Jamal Khan S; Ilyas S; Javid S; Visvanathan C; Jegatheesan V
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 May; 102(9):5331-6. PubMed ID: 20974529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Process efficiency and microbial monitoring in MBR (membrane bioreactor) and CASP (conventional activated sludge process) treatment of tannery wastewater.
    Munz G; Gualtiero M; Salvadori L; Claudia B; Claudio L
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Dec; 99(18):8559-64. PubMed ID: 18499451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optimal sludge retention time for a bench scale MBR treating municipal sewage.
    Pollice A; Laera G; Saturno D; Giordano C; Sandulli R
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(3):319-22. PubMed ID: 18309207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Feasibility of submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAMBR) for treatment of low-strength wastewater.
    Huang Z; Ong SL; Ng HY
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(10):1925-31. PubMed ID: 19039171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Modelling of long-term simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SNDN) performance of a pilot scale membrane bioreactor.
    Sarioglu M; Insel G; Artan N; Orhon D
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(11):1825-33. PubMed ID: 18547937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Membranebioreactor with external membranes.
    Jonkers C; Carrette R; De Lathouwer J; Thoeye C
    Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet; 2001; 66(3a):87-93. PubMed ID: 15954567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Membrane coupled high-performance compact reactor: a new MBR system for advanced wastewater treatment.
    Yeon KM; Park JS; Lee CH; Kim SM
    Water Res; 2005 May; 39(10):1954-61. PubMed ID: 15913704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.