These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20045824)

  • 61. Randomized multi-centre study on the effect of training on tooth shade matching.
    Olms C; Klinke T; Pirek P; Hannak WB
    J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1259-63. PubMed ID: 24056366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Evaluating tooth color matching ability of dental students.
    Jaju RA; Nagai S; Karimbux N; Da Silva JD
    J Dent Educ; 2010 Sep; 74(9):1002-10. PubMed ID: 20837742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. A comparison of human raters and an intra-oral spectrophotometer.
    Browning WD; Chan DC; Blalock JS; Brackett MG
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):337-43. PubMed ID: 19544824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Assessment of perceptibility and acceptability of color difference of denture teeth.
    Alghazali N; Burnside G; Moallem M; Smith P; Preston A; Jarad FD
    J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40 Suppl 1():e10-7. PubMed ID: 22561647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Shade matching assisted by digital photography and computer software.
    Schropp L
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 19141046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Shade matching performance of dental students with three various lighting conditions.
    Nakhaei M; Ghanbarzadeh J; Keyvanloo S; Alavi S; Jafarzadeh H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):100-3. PubMed ID: 23579903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Colour correspondence of a ceramic system in two different shade guides.
    Corciolani G; Vichi A; Goracci C; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2009 Feb; 37(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 18996635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Differences between the human eye and the spectrophotometer in the shade matching of tooth colour.
    Gómez-Polo C; Gómez-Polo M; Celemin-Viñuela A; Martínez Vázquez De Parga JA
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):742-5. PubMed ID: 24140995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Colour perception of laboratory-fired samples of body-coloured ceramic.
    Geary JL; Kinirons MJ
    J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 10071472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Visual and instrumental shade matching using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas.
    Pecho OE; Ghinea R; Alessandretti R; Pérez MM; Della Bona A
    Dent Mater; 2016 Jan; 32(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 26631341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Influence of tab and disk design on shade matching of dental porcelain.
    Barrett AA; Grimaudo NJ; Anusavice KJ; Yang MC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):591-7. PubMed ID: 12488851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Evaluation of an anatomic dual-laminate composite resin shade guide.
    Magne P; Bruzi G; Carvalho AO; Giannini M; Maia HP
    J Dent; 2013 Aug; 41 Suppl 3():e80-6. PubMed ID: 23685035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Allocation of color space for different age groups using three-dimensional shade guide systems.
    Haddad HJ; Salameh Z; Sadig W; Aboushelib M; Jakstat HA
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2011; 6(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 21403930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Reliability of conventional shade guides in teeth color determination.
    Todorović A; Todorović A; Gostović AS; Lazić V; Milicić B; Djurisić S
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2013 Oct; 70(10):929-34. PubMed ID: 24313174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Optimization of tooth color and shade guide design.
    Paravina RD; Majkic G; Imai FH; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 17451478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Shade selection of primary maxillary anterior teeth in children using Vitapan classical shade guide.
    Chenchugopal M; Venumbaka NR; Vijayakumar P; Selvaraju G; Rajendran S; Elangovan A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):657-660. PubMed ID: 28169266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Comparison of the shade matching ability of dental students using two light sources.
    Curd FM; Jasinevicius TR; Graves A; Cox V; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Dec; 96(6):391-6. PubMed ID: 17174655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. The use of digital imaging for colour matching and communication in restorative dentistry.
    Jarad FD; Russell MD; Moss BW
    Br Dent J; 2005 Jul; 199(1):43-9; discussion 33. PubMed ID: 16003426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. [Application and comparison of two shade guide training systems].
    Liu F; Xu TK; Xu MM; Feng HL; Song GY
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Nov; 44(11):645-8. PubMed ID: 20079262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Accuracy of shade matching performed by colour blind and normal dental students using 3D Master and Vita Lumin shade guides.
    Vafaee F; Rakhshan V; Vafaei M; Khoshhal M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2012 Mar; 20(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 22474932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.