165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20046522)
1. Comparisons of three automated systems for genomic DNA extraction in a clinical diagnostic laboratory.
Lee JH; Park Y; Choi JR; Lee EK; Kim HS
Yonsei Med J; 2010 Jan; 51(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 20046522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. DNA extraction from paraffin embedded colorectal carcinoma samples: A comparison study of manual
Kovacs Z; Jung I; Csernak E; Szentirmay Z; Banias L; Rigmanyi G; Gurzu S
World J Clin Oncol; 2019 Sep; 10(9):307-317. PubMed ID: 31572667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of DNA extraction kits for detection of Burkholderia pseudomallei in spiked human whole blood using real-time PCR.
Podnecky NL; Elrod MG; Newton BR; Dauphin LA; Shi J; Chawalchitiporn S; Baggett HC; Hoffmaster AR; Gee JE
PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e58032. PubMed ID: 23460920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of automated and manual nucleic acid extraction methods for detection of enterovirus RNA.
Knepp JH; Geahr MA; Forman MS; Valsamakis A
J Clin Microbiol; 2003 Aug; 41(8):3532-6. PubMed ID: 12904351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Workshop report on the extraction of foetal DNA from maternal plasma.
Legler TJ; Liu Z; Mavrou A; Finning K; Hromadnikova I; Galbiati S; Meaney C; Hultén MA; Crea F; Olsson ML; Maddocks DG; Huang D; Fisher SA; Sprenger-Haussels M; Soussan AA; van der Schoot CE
Prenat Diagn; 2007 Sep; 27(9):824-9. PubMed ID: 17604339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samples.
Claassen S; du Toit E; Kaba M; Moodley C; Zar HJ; Nicol MP
J Microbiol Methods; 2013 Aug; 94(2):103-110. PubMed ID: 23684993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of manual and automated nucleic acid extraction from whole-blood samples.
Riemann K; Adamzik M; Frauenrath S; Egensperger R; Schmid KW; Brockmeyer NH; Siffert W
J Clin Lab Anal; 2007; 21(4):244-8. PubMed ID: 17621359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of five automated and one manual method for Toxoplasma and human DNA extraction from artificially spiked amniotic fluid.
Yera H; Ménégaut L; Brenier-Pinchart MP; Touafek F; Bastien P; Dalle F;
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2018 Oct; 24(10):1100.e7-1100.e11. PubMed ID: 29373837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Purification of Circulating Cell-Free DNA from Plasma and Urine Using the Automated Large-Volume Extraction on the QIAsymphony® SP Instrument.
Wolf A; Beller K; Groemminger S; Hofmann W; Sachse M; Fassunke J
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 924():179-185. PubMed ID: 27753041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of automated and manual commercial DNA extraction methods for detection of Francisella tularensis DNA from suspensions and spiked swabs by real-time polymerase chain reaction.
Dauphin LA; Walker RE; Petersen JM; Bowen MD
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2011 Jul; 70(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 21546201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Direct comparison of QIAamp DSP Virus Kit and QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit regarding cell-free fetal DNA isolation from maternal peripheral blood.
Jain M; Balatsky AV; Revina DB; Samokhodskaya LM
Mol Cell Probes; 2019 Feb; 43():13-19. PubMed ID: 30584912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multicenter comparative evaluation of five commercial methods for toxoplasma DNA extraction from amniotic fluid.
Yera H; Filisetti D; Bastien P; Ancelle T; Thulliez P; Delhaes L
J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Dec; 47(12):3881-6. PubMed ID: 19846633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of three different mycobacterial DNA isolation methods].
Alp A; Alp S; Saribaş Z; Hasçelik G
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2007 Jul; 41(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 17933250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of automated and manual commercial DNA extraction methods for recovery of Brucella DNA from suspensions and spiked swabs.
Dauphin LA; Hutchins RJ; Bost LA; Bowen MD
J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Dec; 47(12):3920-6. PubMed ID: 19846627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of different commercial DNA extraction kits and PCR protocols for the detection of Echinococcus multilocularis eggs in faecal samples from foxes.
Maksimov P; Schares G; Press S; Fröhlich A; Basso W; Herzig M; Conraths FJ
Vet Parasitol; 2017 Apr; 237():83-93. PubMed ID: 28268038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fetal DNA: strategies for optimal recovery.
Legler TJ; Heermann KH; Liu Z; Soussan AA; van der Schoot CE
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 444():209-18. PubMed ID: 18425483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of different pre-lysis methods and extraction kits for recovery of Streptococcus agalacticae (Lancefield group B Streptococcus) DNA from whole blood.
Burke RM; McKenna JP; Cox C; Coyle PV; Shields MD; Fairley DJ
J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Oct; 129():103-108. PubMed ID: 27546716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of Maxwell® 16 for automated DNA extraction from whole blood and formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue.
Khokhar SK; Mitui M; Leos NK; Rogers BB; Park JY
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Oct; 50(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 22022984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of commercial DNA extraction kits for isolation and purification of bacterial and eukaryotic DNA from PAH-contaminated soils.
Mahmoudi N; Slater GF; Fulthorpe RR
Can J Microbiol; 2011 Aug; 57(8):623-8. PubMed ID: 21815819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of five methods for extraction of bacterial DNA from human faecal samples.
McOrist AL; Jackson M; Bird AR
J Microbiol Methods; 2002 Jul; 50(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 11997164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
