These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20046943)

  • 1. The influence of visual feedback and register changes on sign language production: A kinematic study with deaf signers.
    Emmorey K; Gertsberg N; Korpics F; Wright CE
    Appl Psycholinguist; 2009 Jan; 30(1):187-203. PubMed ID: 20046943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of visual feedback during signing: evidence from signers with impaired vision.
    Emmorey K; Korpics F; Petronio K
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2009; 14(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 18495656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual feedback and self-monitoring of sign language.
    Emmorey K; Bosworth R; Kraljic T
    J Mem Lang; 2009 Oct; 61(3):398-411. PubMed ID: 20161058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhanced facial discrimination: effects of experience with American sign language.
    Bettger J; Emmorey K; McCullough S; Bellugi U
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 1997; 2(4):223-33. PubMed ID: 15579850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Second language acquisition of American Sign Language influences co-speech gesture production.
    Weisberg J; Casey S; Sehyr ZS; Emmorey K
    Biling (Camb Engl); 2020 May; 23(3):473-482. PubMed ID: 32733161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Eye Tracking Study on the Perception and Comprehension of Unimodal and Bimodal Linguistic Inputs by Deaf Adolescents.
    Mastrantuono E; Saldaña D; Rodríguez-Ortiz IR
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1044. PubMed ID: 28680416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examining the contribution of motor movement and language dominance to increased left lateralization during sign generation in native signers.
    Gutierrez-Sigut E; Payne H; MacSweeney M
    Brain Lang; 2016 Aug; 159():109-17. PubMed ID: 27388786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brain activations associated with sign production using word and picture inputs in deaf signers.
    Hu Z; Wang W; Liu H; Peng D; Yang Y; Li K; Zhang JX; Ding G
    Brain Lang; 2011 Feb; 116(2):64-70. PubMed ID: 21215442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensorimotor system engagement during ASL sign perception: An EEG study in deaf signers and hearing non-signers.
    Kubicek E; Quandt LC
    Cortex; 2019 Oct; 119():457-469. PubMed ID: 31505437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sign Lowering and Phonetic Reduction in American Sign Language.
    Tyrone ME; Mauk CE
    J Phon; 2010 Apr; 38(2):317-328. PubMed ID: 20607146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ASL Phonological Fluency: How Do Deaf Signers Retrieve and Produce Signs?
    Beal JS; Bowman S
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2023 Mar; 28(2):178-188. PubMed ID: 36526438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phonetic reduction and variation in American Sign Language: A quantitative study of sign lowering.
    Tyrone ME; Mauk CE
    Lab Phonol; 2012 Oct; 3(2):425-453. PubMed ID: 26146525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship between sign production and sign comprehension: What handedness reveals.
    Watkins F; Thompson RL
    Cognition; 2017 Jul; 164():144-149. PubMed ID: 28427030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual field asymmetries for motion processing in deaf and hearing signers.
    Bosworth RG; Dobkins KR
    Brain Cogn; 2002 Jun; 49(1):170-81. PubMed ID: 12027401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. American Sign Language Syntax and Analogical Reasoning Skills Are Influenced by Early Acquisition and Age of Entry to Signing Schools for the Deaf.
    Henner J; Caldwell-Harris CL; Novogrodsky R; Hoffmeister R
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1982. PubMed ID: 28082932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sign language experience redistributes attentional resources to the inferior visual field.
    Stoll C; Dye MWG
    Cognition; 2019 Oct; 191():103957. PubMed ID: 31255921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attitudes Toward Signing Avatars Vary Depending on Hearing Status, Age of Signed Language Acquisition, and Avatar Type.
    Quandt LC; Willis A; Schwenk M; Weeks K; Ferster R
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():730917. PubMed ID: 35222173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Emerging ASL Distinctions in Sign-Speech Bilinguals' Signs and Co-speech Gestures in Placement Descriptions.
    Frederiksen AT
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():686485. PubMed ID: 34413812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aphasic and parkinsonian signing: differences in phonological disruption.
    Brentari D; Poizner H; Kegl J
    Brain Lang; 1995 Jan; 48(1):69-105. PubMed ID: 7712149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural systems underlying British Sign Language and audio-visual English processing in native users.
    MacSweeney M; Woll B; Campbell R; McGuire PK; David AS; Williams SC; Suckling J; Calvert GA; Brammer MJ
    Brain; 2002 Jul; 125(Pt 7):1583-93. PubMed ID: 12077007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.