These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20046952)

  • 21. Some cautions on the use of instrumental variables estimators in outcomes research: how bias in instrumental variables estimators is affected by instrument strength, instrument contamination, and sample size.
    Crown WH; Henk HJ; Vanness DJ
    Value Health; 2011 Dec; 14(8):1078-84. PubMed ID: 22152177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessing causal treatment effect estimation when using large observational datasets.
    John ER; Abrams KR; Brightling CE; Sheehan NA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):207. PubMed ID: 31726969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A tutorial on the use of instrumental variables in pharmacoepidemiology.
    Ertefaie A; Small DS; Flory JH; Hennessy S
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Apr; 26(4):357-367. PubMed ID: 28239929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Instrumental variables estimation of exposure effects on a time-to-event endpoint using structural cumulative survival models.
    Martinussen T; Vansteelandt S; Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ; Zucker DM
    Biometrics; 2017 Dec; 73(4):1140-1149. PubMed ID: 28493302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mendelian randomization using semiparametric linear transformation models.
    Huang YT
    Stat Med; 2020 Mar; 39(7):890-905. PubMed ID: 31879996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Using Sensitivity Analyses for Unobserved Confounding to Address Covariate Measurement Error in Propensity Score Methods.
    Rudolph KE; Stuart EA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 187(3):604-613. PubMed ID: 28992211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ratio estimation with measurement error in the auxiliary variate.
    Gregoire TG; Salas C
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):590-8. PubMed ID: 18759838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A synthetic estimator for the efficacy of clinical trials with all-or-nothing compliance.
    Antonelli J; Han B; Cefalu M
    Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(29):4604-4615. PubMed ID: 28833307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models With Small Sample Sizes.
    Lüdtke O; Ulitzsch E; Robitzsch A
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():615162. PubMed ID: 33995176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Locally Efficient Semiparametric Estimators for Proportional Hazards Models with Measurement Error.
    Xu Y; Li Y; Song X
    Scand Stat Theory Appl; 2016 Jun; 43(2):558-572. PubMed ID: 27453626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Propensity Score-Based Estimators With Multiple Error-Prone Covariates.
    Hong H; Aaby DA; Siddique J; Stuart EA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 188(1):222-230. PubMed ID: 30358801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Negative control exposure studies in the presence of measurement error: implications for attempted effect estimate calibration.
    Sanderson E; Macdonald-Wallis C; Davey Smith G
    Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Apr; 47(2):587-596. PubMed ID: 29088358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Estimating causal effects from a randomized clinical trial when noncompliance is measured with error.
    Boatman JA; Vock DM; Koopmeiners JS; Donny EC
    Biostatistics; 2018 Jan; 19(1):103-118. PubMed ID: 28605411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Frequentist model-averaged estimators and tests for univariate twin models.
    Williams CJ; Christian JC
    Behav Genet; 2006 Sep; 36(5):687-96. PubMed ID: 16710780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Time dependent hazard ratio estimation using instrumental variables without conditioning on an omitted covariate.
    MacKenzie TA; Martinez-Camblor P; O'Malley AJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Mar; 21(1):56. PubMed ID: 33743583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A general approach to evaluating the bias of 2-stage instrumental variable estimators.
    Wan F; Small D; Mitra N
    Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(12):1997-2015. PubMed ID: 29572890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Spatial Linear Mixed Models with Covariate Measurement Errors.
    Li Y; Tang H; Lin X
    Stat Sin; 2009; 19(3):1077-1093. PubMed ID: 20046975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A generalized class of estimators for sensitive variable in the presence of measurement error and non-response.
    Zahid E; Shabbir J; Gupta S; Onyango R; Saeed S
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0261561. PubMed ID: 35045076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Simple efficient bias corrected instrumental variable estimator for randomized trials with noncompliance.
    Chan KC
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Jul; 33(4):786-93. PubMed ID: 22484340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Adjustment for Baseline Covariates to Increase Efficiency in RCTs with Binary Endpoint: A Comparison of Bayesian and Frequentist Approaches.
    Berchialla P; Sciannameo V; Urru S; Lanera C; Azzolina D; Gregori D; Baldi I
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(15):. PubMed ID: 34360051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.