These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20047658)

  • 61. Towards improving searches for optimal phylogenies.
    Ford E; St John K; Wheeler WC
    Syst Biol; 2015 Jan; 64(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 25164916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Genus-level supertree of Cyprinidae (Actinopterygii: Cypriniformes), partitioned qualitative clade support and test of macro-evolutionary scenarios.
    Gaubert P; Denys G; Oberdorff T
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2009 Nov; 84(4):653-89. PubMed ID: 19857213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Mixed integer linear programming for maximum-parsimony phylogeny inference.
    Sridhar S; Lam F; Blelloch GE; Ravi R; Schwartz R
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2008; 5(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 18670037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. An ILP solution for the gene duplication problem.
    Chang WC; Burleigh GJ; Fernández-Baca DF; Eulenstein O
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Feb; 12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S14. PubMed ID: 21342543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Supertrees Based on the Subtree Prune-and-Regraft Distance.
    Whidden C; Zeh N; Beiko RG
    Syst Biol; 2014 Jul; 63(4):566-81. PubMed ID: 24695589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Supertrees join the mainstream of phylogenetics.
    Cotton JA; Wilkinson M
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2009 Jan; 24(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 19022523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Decomposition techniques with mixed integer programming and heuristics for home healthcare planning.
    Laesanklang W; Landa-Silva D
    Ann Oper Res; 2017; 256(1):93-127. PubMed ID: 31258236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Implementing and testing Bayesian and maximum-likelihood supertree methods in phylogenetics.
    Akanni WA; Wilkinson M; Creevey CJ; Foster PG; Pisani D
    R Soc Open Sci; 2015 Aug; 2(8):140436. PubMed ID: 26361544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. A supertree approach to shorebird phylogeny.
    Thomas GH; Wills MA; Székely T
    BMC Evol Biol; 2004 Aug; 4():28. PubMed ID: 15329156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Polynomial-time algorithms for building a consensus MUL-tree.
    Cui Y; Jansson J; Sung WK
    J Comput Biol; 2012 Sep; 19(9):1073-88. PubMed ID: 22963134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Explosions and hot spots in supertree methods.
    Day WH; McMorris FR; Wilkinson M
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Jul; 253(2):345-8. PubMed ID: 18472112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. SuperFine: fast and accurate supertree estimation.
    Swenson MS; Suri R; Linder CR; Warnow T
    Syst Biol; 2012 Mar; 61(2):214-27. PubMed ID: 21934137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Mega-phylogeny approach for comparative biology: an alternative to supertree and supermatrix approaches.
    Smith SA; Beaulieu JM; Donoghue MJ
    BMC Evol Biol; 2009 Feb; 9():37. PubMed ID: 19210768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. A Bayesian Supertree Model for Genome-Wide Species Tree Reconstruction.
    De Oliveira Martins L; Mallo D; Posada D
    Syst Biol; 2016 May; 65(3):397-416. PubMed ID: 25281847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Some axiomatic limitations for consensus and supertree functions on hierarchies.
    McMorris FR; Powers RC
    J Theor Biol; 2016 Sep; 404():342-347. PubMed ID: 27320681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Minimum-flip supertrees: complexity and algorithms.
    Chen D; Eulenstein O; Fernandez-Baca D; Sanderson M
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2006; 3(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 17048402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. An application of supertree methods to Mammalian mitogenomic sequences.
    Campbell V; Lapointe FJ
    Evol Bioinform Online; 2010 May; 6():57-71. PubMed ID: 20535231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. An algorithm for constructing parsimonious hybridization networks with multiple phylogenetic trees.
    Wu Y
    J Comput Biol; 2013 Oct; 20(10):792-804. PubMed ID: 24093230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The Performance of Two Supertree Schemes Compared Using Synthetic and Real Data Quartet Input.
    Avni E; Yona Z; Cohen R; Snir S
    J Mol Evol; 2018 Feb; 86(2):150-165. PubMed ID: 29460038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Reconstructing protein and gene phylogenies using reconciliation and soft-clustering.
    Kuitche E; Lafond M; Ouangraoua A
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2017 Dec; 15(6):1740007. PubMed ID: 29169277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.