These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20047664)

  • 1. A simulation study comparing supertree and combined analysis methods using SMIDGen.
    Swenson MS; Barbançon F; Warnow T; Linder CR
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2010 Jan; 5():8. PubMed ID: 20047664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Complete generic-level phylogenetic analyses of palms (Arecaceae) with comparisons of supertree and supermatrix approaches.
    Baker WJ; Savolainen V; Asmussen-Lange CB; Chase MW; Dransfield J; Forest F; Harley MM; Uhl NW; Wilkinson M
    Syst Biol; 2009 Apr; 58(2):240-56. PubMed ID: 20525581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MRL and SuperFine+MRL: new supertree methods.
    Nguyen N; Mirarab S; Warnow T
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2012 Jan; 7(1):3. PubMed ID: 22280525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bad Clade Deletion Supertrees: A Fast and Accurate Supertree Algorithm.
    Fleischauer M; Böcker S
    Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Sep; 34(9):2408-2421. PubMed ID: 28873954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of the accuracy of matrix representation with parsimony analysis supertree construction.
    Bininda-Emonds OR; Sanderson MJ
    Syst Biol; 2001 Aug; 50(4):565-79. PubMed ID: 12116654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative performance of supertree algorithms in large data sets using the soapberry family (Sapindaceae) as a case study.
    Buerki S; Forest F; Salamin N; Alvarez N
    Syst Biol; 2011 Jan; 60(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 21068445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of flip supertree construction with a heuristic algorithm.
    Eulenstein O; Chen D; Burleigh JG; Fernández-Baca D; Sanderson MJ
    Syst Biol; 2004 Apr; 53(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 15205054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved heuristics for minimum-flip supertree construction.
    Chen D; Eulenstein O; Fernández-Baca D; Burleigh JG
    Evol Bioinform Online; 2007 Feb; 2():347-56. PubMed ID: 19455229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SuperFine: fast and accurate supertree estimation.
    Swenson MS; Suri R; Linder CR; Warnow T
    Syst Biol; 2012 Mar; 61(2):214-27. PubMed ID: 21934137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Novel versus unsupported clades: assessing the qualitative support for clades in MRP supertrees.
    Bininda-Emonds OR
    Syst Biol; 2003 Dec; 52(6):839-48. PubMed ID: 14668120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Polynomial supertree methods revisited.
    Brinkmeyer M; Griebel T; Böcker S
    Adv Bioinformatics; 2011; 2011():524182. PubMed ID: 22229028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robinson-Foulds supertrees.
    Bansal MS; Burleigh JG; Eulenstein O; Fernández-Baca D
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2010 Feb; 5():18. PubMed ID: 20181274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An application of supertree methods to Mammalian mitogenomic sequences.
    Campbell V; Lapointe FJ
    Evol Bioinform Online; 2010 May; 6():57-71. PubMed ID: 20535231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An experimental study of Quartets MaxCut and other supertree methods.
    Swenson MS; Suri R; Linder CR; Warnow T
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2011 Apr; 6():7. PubMed ID: 21504600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. BCD Beam Search: considering suboptimal partial solutions in Bad Clade Deletion supertrees.
    Fleischauer M; Böcker S
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e4987. PubMed ID: 29900080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phylogeny and divergence of the pinnipeds (Carnivora: Mammalia) assessed using a multigene dataset.
    Higdon JW; Bininda-Emonds OR; Beck RM; Ferguson SH
    BMC Evol Biol; 2007 Nov; 7():216. PubMed ID: 17996107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Performance of Two Supertree Schemes Compared Using Synthetic and Real Data Quartet Input.
    Avni E; Yona Z; Cohen R; Snir S
    J Mol Evol; 2018 Feb; 86(2):150-165. PubMed ID: 29460038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of supermatrix and supertree methods for multilocus phylogenetics using organismal datasets.
    Janies DA; Studer J; Handelman SK; Linchangco G
    Cladistics; 2013 Oct; 29(5):560-566. PubMed ID: 34798766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The shape of supertrees to come: tree shape related properties of fourteen supertree methods.
    Wilkinson M; Cotton JA; Creevey C; Eulenstein O; Harris SR; Lapointe FJ; Levasseur C; McInerney JO; Pisani D; Thorley JL
    Syst Biol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):419-31. PubMed ID: 16012108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Building supertrees: an empirical assessment using the grass family (Poaceae).
    Salamin N; Hodkinson TR; Savolainen V
    Syst Biol; 2002 Feb; 51(1):136-50. PubMed ID: 11943096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.