167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20047805)
1. Evaluation of shape variability of stallion sperm heads by means of image analysis and Fourier descriptors.
Severa L; Máchal L; Svábová L; Mamica O
Anim Reprod Sci; 2010 May; 119(1-2):50-5. PubMed ID: 20047805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Morphologically distinct sperm subpopulations defined by Fourier shape descriptors in fresh ejaculates correlate with variation in boar semen quality following cryopreservation.
Thurston LM; Watson PF; Mileham AJ; Holt WV
J Androl; 2001; 22(3):382-94. PubMed ID: 11330638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sperm head morphometry analysis of ejaculate and dismount stallion semen samples.
Gravance CG; Champion Z; Liu IK; Casey PJ
Anim Reprod Sci; 1997 May; 47(1-2):149-55. PubMed ID: 9233514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do computer-assisted, morphometric-derived sperm characteristics reflect DNA status in canine spermatozoa?
Núñez-Martinez I; Moran JM; Peña FJ
Reprod Domest Anim; 2005 Dec; 40(6):537-43. PubMed ID: 16324080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Morphometric classification of Spanish thoroughbred stallion sperm heads.
Hidalgo M; Rodríguez I; Dorado J; Soler C
Anim Reprod Sci; 2008 Jan; 103(3-4):374-8. PubMed ID: 17628363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Functional significance of the sperm head morphometric size and shape for determining freezability in iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) epididymal sperm samples.
Esteso MC; Soler AJ; Fernández-Santos MR; Quintero-Moreno AA; Garde JJ
J Androl; 2006; 27(5):662-70. PubMed ID: 16728722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intra- and inter-stallion variation in sperm morphology and their relationship with fertility.
Love CC; Varner DD; Thompson JA
J Reprod Fertil Suppl; 2000; (56):93-100. PubMed ID: 20681120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of sperm head shape at high magnification revealed correlation of sperm DNA fragmentation with aberrant head ellipticity and angularity.
Utsuno H; Oka K; Yamamoto A; Shiozawa T
Fertil Steril; 2013 May; 99(6):1573-80. PubMed ID: 23477680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated sperm morphometry and morphology analysis of canine semen by the Hamilton-Thorne analyser.
Rijsselaere T; Van Soom A; Hoflack G; Maes D; de Kruif A
Theriogenology; 2004 Oct; 62(7):1292-306. PubMed ID: 15325556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantification of normal head morphometry of stallion spermatozoa.
Gravance CG; Liu IK; Davis RO; Hughes JP; Casey PJ
J Reprod Fertil; 1996 Sep; 108(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 8958826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of cryopreservation on sperm head morphometry in Florida male goat related to sperm freezability.
Hidalgo M; Rodríguez I; Dorado JM
Anim Reprod Sci; 2007 Jul; 100(1-2):61-72. PubMed ID: 16904275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Morphometric changes in goat sperm heads induced by cryopreservation.
Marco-Jiménez F; Viudes-de-Castro MP; Balasch S; Mocé E; Silvestre MA; Gomez EA; Vicente JS
Cryobiology; 2006 Apr; 52(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 16499897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variability, repeatability and phenotypic relationships of several characteristics of production and semen quality in rabbit.
García-Tomás M; Sánchez J; Rafel O; Ramon J; Piles M
Anim Reprod Sci; 2006 Jun; 93(1-2):88-100. PubMed ID: 16084038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences in boar sperm head shape and dimensions recorded by computer-assisted sperm morphometry are not related to chromatin integrity.
Saravia F; Núñez-Martínez I; Morán JM; Soler C; Muriel A; Rodríguez-Martínez H; Peña FJ
Theriogenology; 2007 Jul; 68(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 17555808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization of spermatozoa by planar morphometry.
Harr R
Clin Lab Sci; 1997; 10(4):190-6. PubMed ID: 10169618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identification of sperm-head morphometric subpopulations in iberian red deer epididymal sperm samples.
Esteso MC; Fernández-Santos MR; Soler AJ; Montoro V; Martínez-Pastor F; Garde JJ
Reprod Domest Anim; 2009 Apr; 44(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 18992078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identification of sperm morphometric subpopulations in the canine ejaculate: do they reflect different subpopulations in sperm chromatin integrity?
Núñez-Martinez I; Moran JM; Peña FJ
Zygote; 2007 Aug; 15(3):257-66. PubMed ID: 17637107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of computer-assisted sperm motility analysis parameters in semen from Belgian blue and Holstein-Friesian bulls.
Hoflack G; Opsomer G; Rijsselaere T; Van Soom A; Maes D; de Kruif A; Duchateau L
Reprod Domest Anim; 2007 Apr; 42(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 17348972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of in vitro laboratory analyses with the fertility of cryopreserved stallion spermatozoa.
Kirk ES; Squires EL; Graham JK
Theriogenology; 2005 Oct; 64(6):1422-39. PubMed ID: 16139616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sperm selection for ICSI: shape properties do not predict the absence or presence of numerical chromosomal aberrations.
Celik-Ozenci C; Jakab A; Kovacs T; Catalanotti J; Demir R; Bray-Ward P; Ward D; Huszar G
Hum Reprod; 2004 Sep; 19(9):2052-9. PubMed ID: 15205404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
