These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20048102)
1. The influence of head size and sex on the outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing. McBryde CW; Theivendran K; Thomas AM; Treacy RB; Pynsent PB J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Jan; 92(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 20048102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up. Azam MQ; McMahon S; Hawdon G; Sankineani SR Int Orthop; 2016 Jan; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25820838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Independent predictors of revision following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data. Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Porter ML; Deehan DJ; Reed MR J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):746-54. PubMed ID: 22628587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The design of the acetabular component and size of the femoral head influence the risk of revision following 34 721 single-brand cemented hip replacements: a retrospective cohort study of medium-term data from a National Joint Registry. Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Gregg PJ; Brewster N; Deehan DJ; Reed MR J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Dec; 94(12):1611-7. PubMed ID: 23188900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Canadian Arthroplasty Society's experience with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. An analysis of 2773 hips. Canadian Arthroplasty Society Bone Joint J; 2013 Aug; 95-B(8):1045-51. PubMed ID: 23908418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Birmingham hip resurfacing at a mean of ten years: results from an independent centre. Coulter G; Young DA; Dalziel RE; Shimmin AJ J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Mar; 94(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 22371536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: comparison of three designs from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Junnila M; Kostensalo I; Virolainen P; Remes V; Matilainen M; Vahlberg T; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A; Itälä A; Mäkelä K Scand J Surg; 2014 Mar; 103(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 24345980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Frequent femoral neck osteolysis with Birmingham mid-head resection resurfacing arthroplasty in young patients. Asaad A; Hart A; Khoo MM; Ilo K; Schaller G; Black JD; Muirhead-Allwood S Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3770-8. PubMed ID: 25981716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Results of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 12 to 15 years: a single-surgeon series. Daniel J; Pradhan C; Ziaee H; Pynsent PB; McMinn DJ Bone Joint J; 2014 Oct; 96-B(10):1298-306. PubMed ID: 25274912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented tapered femoral component. McLaughlin JR; Lee KR J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jun; 90(6):1290-6. PubMed ID: 18519323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Birmingham hip resurfacing: the prevalence of failure. Carrothers AD; Gilbert RE; Jaiswal A; Richardson JB J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Oct; 92(10):1344-50. PubMed ID: 20884969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The outcome of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in patients aged < 50 years up to 14 years post-operatively. Matharu GS; McBryde CW; Pynsent WB; Pynsent PB; Treacy RB Bone Joint J; 2013 Sep; 95-B(9):1172-7. PubMed ID: 23997127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Functional results of isolated femoral revision of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Gilbert RE; Cheung G; Carrothers AD; Meyer C; Richardson JB J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Jul; 92(7):1600-4. PubMed ID: 20595565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Revision total hip arthoplasty: factors associated with re-revision surgery. Khatod M; Cafri G; Inacio MC; Schepps AL; Paxton EW; Bini SA J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Mar; 97(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 25740025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of hip resurfacing arthroplasty: 6 year results from an international multisurgeon prospective cohort study. Aulakh TS; Jayasekera N; Singh R; Patel A; Roulahamin N; Kuiper JH; Richardson JB Acta Orthop Belg; 2015 Jun; 81(2):197-208. PubMed ID: 26280956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The early outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: an independent Thai surgeon experiences. Larbpaiboonpong V; Turajane T; Pragtong P J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S134-40. PubMed ID: 20120675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Failure rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Smith AJ; Dieppe P; Howard PW; Blom AW; Lancet; 2012 Nov; 380(9855):1759-66. PubMed ID: 23036895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical and Functional Outcomes of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing System. Pascual-Garrido C; Morris BL; Dayton MR Orthopedics; 2016; 39(2):e236-9. PubMed ID: 26840695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Independent predictors of failure up to 7.5 years after 35 386 single-brand cementless total hip replacements: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data. Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Rymaszewska M; Gregg PJ; Deehan DJ; Reed MR Bone Joint J; 2013 Jun; 95-B(6):747-57. PubMed ID: 23723267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Five to Ten-Year Results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Implant in the U.S.: A Single Institution's Experience. Ford MC; Hellman MD; Kazarian GS; Clohisy JC; Nunley RM; Barrack RL J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Nov; 100(21):1879-1887. PubMed ID: 30399083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]