These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2004835)

  • 1. Biomechanics of the intact, prepared and restored tooth: some clinical implications.
    Hood JA
    Int Dent J; 1991 Feb; 41(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 2004835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Structural optimization of dental restorations using the principle of adaptive growth.
    Couegnat G; Fok SL; Cooper JE; Qualtrough AJ
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 16061281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Newer Class I cavity preparation for permanent teeth using air abrasion and composite restoration.
    Ferdianakis K; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(3):201-16. PubMed ID: 10686867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The continuum of restorative materials in pediatric dentistry--a review for the clinician.
    Berg JH
    Pediatr Dent; 1998; 20(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 9566012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations.
    Shor A; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Libman WJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for the management of dental caries.
    Smales RJ; Yip HK
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 12073723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of base/liner use on restoration leakage.
    von Fraunhofer JA; Marshall KR; Holman BG
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(2):106-9. PubMed ID: 16689065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical and microbiological effects of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissues adjacent to subgingival class V restorations.
    Paolantonio M; D'ercole S; Perinetti G; Tripodi D; Catamo G; Serra E; Bruè C; Piccolomini R
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 15016024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Gomide HA; Araujo CA; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combining structural-thermal coupled field FE analysis and the Taguchi method to evaluate the relative contributions of multi-factors in a premolar adhesive MOD restoration.
    Lin CL; Chang YH; Lin YF
    J Dent; 2008 Aug; 36(8):626-36. PubMed ID: 18550252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new classification and techniques for simple restorative dentistry.
    Mount GJ
    Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 1998 Oct; 14():94-8. PubMed ID: 10895619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Resistance to maxillary premolar fractures after restoration of class II preparations with resin composite or ceromer.
    de Freitas CR; Miranda MI; de Andrade MF; Flores VH; Vaz LG; Guimarães C
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Sep; 33(8):589-94. PubMed ID: 12238690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Artificial formed caries-like lesions around esthetic restorative materials.
    Attar N; Onen A
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2002; 26(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11990054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Penetration of the pulp chamber by bleaching agents in teeth restored with various restorative materials.
    Gökay O; Yilmaz F; Akin S; Tunçbìlek M; Ertan R
    J Endod; 2000 Feb; 26(2):92-4. PubMed ID: 11194380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 11572296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally invasive dentistry using sonic and ultra-sonic devices in ultraconservative Class 2 restorations.
    Koubi S; Tassery H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):155-65. PubMed ID: 18264538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
    Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A direct approach to restore anterior teeth.
    Denehy GE
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):55D-59D. PubMed ID: 11763919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.