These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20048384)

  • 1. Multiple testing and its applications to microarrays.
    Ge Y; Sealfon SC; Speed TP
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2009 Dec; 18(6):543-63. PubMed ID: 20048384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis.
    Liu P; Hwang JT
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17237060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating the false discovery rate using nonparametric deconvolution.
    van de Wiel MA; Kim KI
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):806-15. PubMed ID: 17825012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing differential expression in two-color microarrays: a resampling-based empirical Bayes approach.
    Li D; Le Pape MA; Parikh NI; Chen WX; Dye TD
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e80099. PubMed ID: 24312198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiplicity issues in microarray experiments.
    Bretz F; Landgrebe J; Brunner E
    Methods Inf Med; 2005; 44(3):431-7. PubMed ID: 16113769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies.
    Ploner A; Calza S; Gusnanto A; Pawitan Y
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(5):556-65. PubMed ID: 16368770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Normal uniform mixture differential gene expression detection for cDNA microarrays.
    Dean N; Raftery AE
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():173. PubMed ID: 16011807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Some comments on instability of false discovery rate estimation.
    Qiu X; Yakovlev A
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2006 Oct; 4(5):1057-68. PubMed ID: 17099941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An efficient Monte Carlo approach to assessing statistical significance in genomic studies.
    Lin DY
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 21(6):781-7. PubMed ID: 15454414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A note on the false discovery rate and inconsistent comparisons between experiments.
    Higdon R; van Belle G; Kolker E
    Bioinformatics; 2008 May; 24(10):1225-8. PubMed ID: 18424815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Re-sampling strategy to improve the estimation of number of null hypotheses in FDR control under strong correlation structures.
    Lu X; Perkins DL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 8():157. PubMed ID: 17509157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size for FDR-control in microarray data analysis.
    Jung SH
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(14):3097-104. PubMed ID: 15845654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parallel multiplicity and error discovery rate (EDR) in microarray experiments.
    Xu WW; Carter CJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Sep; 11():465. PubMed ID: 20846437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A renewed approach to the nonparametric analysis of replicated microarray experiments.
    Jung K; Quast K; Gannoun A; Urfer W
    Biom J; 2006 Apr; 48(2):245-54. PubMed ID: 16708776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved estimation of the noncentrality parameter distribution from a large number of t-statistics, with applications to false discovery rate estimation in microarray data analysis.
    Qu L; Nettleton D; Dekkers JC
    Biometrics; 2012 Dec; 68(4):1178-87. PubMed ID: 22551000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Practical FDR-based sample size calculations in microarray experiments.
    Hu J; Zou F; Wright FA
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 21(15):3264-72. PubMed ID: 15932903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On correcting the overestimation of the permutation-based false discovery rate estimator.
    Jiao S; Zhang S
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(15):1655-61. PubMed ID: 18573796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Local-pooled-error test for identifying differentially expressed genes with a small number of replicated microarrays.
    Jain N; Thatte J; Braciale T; Ley K; O'Connell M; Lee JK
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Oct; 19(15):1945-51. PubMed ID: 14555628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Construction of null statistics in permutation-based multiple testing for multi-factorial microarray experiments.
    Gao X
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(12):1486-94. PubMed ID: 16574697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures.
    Reiner A; Yekutieli D; Benjamini Y
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Feb; 19(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 12584122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.