These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20048631)

  • 1. Mammometrics: the standardization of aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery.
    Tepper OM; Unger JG; Small KH; Feldman D; Kumar N; Choi M; Karp NS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Jan; 125(1):393-400. PubMed ID: 20048631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discussion. Shaping the breast in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: an easy three-step principle. Part IV--aesthetic breast surgery.
    Hammond DC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Aug; 124(2):385-386. PubMed ID: 19644252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discussion. Shaping the breast in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: an easy three-step principle. Part IV--aesthetic breast surgery.
    Nahabedian MY
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Aug; 124(2):383-384. PubMed ID: 19644251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Objective outcome evaluation of breast surgery.
    Farinella GM; Impoco G; Gallo G; Spoto S; Catanuto G; Nava MB
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 1):776-83. PubMed ID: 17354961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of breast resection weight in reduction mammaplasty based on 3-dimensional surface imaging.
    Eder M; Grabhorn A; Waldenfels Fv; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Machens HG; Kovacs L
    Surg Innov; 2013 Aug; 20(4):356-64. PubMed ID: 22983806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re: Virtual 3-dimensional modeling as a valuable adjunct to aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery.
    Eder M; Papadopulos NA; Kovacs L
    Am J Surg; 2007 Oct; 194(4):563-5; author reply 565-6. PubMed ID: 17826081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metrics of the Aesthetically Perfect Breast.
    Atiye B; Chahine F
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2018 Oct; 42(5):1187-1194. PubMed ID: 30006829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Weighted regularized statistical shape space projection for breast 3D model reconstruction.
    Ruiz G; Ramon E; García J; Sukno FM; Ballester MAG
    Med Image Anal; 2018 Jul; 47():164-179. PubMed ID: 29753181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New aspects in digital breast assessment: further refinement of a method for automated digital anthropometry.
    Hartmann R; Weiherer M; Schiltz D; Baringer M; Noisser V; Hösl V; Eigenberger A; Seitz S; Palm C; Prantl L; Brébant V
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Mar; 303(3):721-728. PubMed ID: 33184690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Virtual 3-dimensional modeling as a valuable adjunct to aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery.
    Tepper OM; Small K; Rudolph L; Choi M; Karp N
    Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):548-51. PubMed ID: 16978973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer planning for breast reconstruction by tissue expansion: an update.
    Raposio E; Cicchetti S; Adami M; Ciliberti RG; Santi PL
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jun; 113(7):2095-7. PubMed ID: 15253203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anthropometrics in preoperative prediction of resection weight in reduction mammaplasty: Is it really accurate?
    Wamalwa AO; Wanjeri JK; Nangole FW; Khainga SO
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Jun; 71(6):e15-e16. PubMed ID: 29625902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Laminated Nature of the Pectoralis Major Muscle and the Redefinition of the Inframammary Fold: Clinical Implications in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery.
    Maclin MM; Deigni OA; Bengtson BP
    Clin Plast Surg; 2015 Oct; 42(4):465-79. PubMed ID: 26408437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Review of three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging for oncoplastic, reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery.
    O'Connell RL; Stevens RJ; Harris PA; Rusby JE
    Breast; 2015 Aug; 24(4):331-42. PubMed ID: 25935829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ideal anthropomorphic values of the female breast: correlation of pluralistic aesthetic evaluations with objective measurements.
    Liu YJ; Thomson JG
    Ann Plast Surg; 2011 Jul; 67(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 21301308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acellular dermal matrices: economic considerations in reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery.
    Macadam SA; Lennox PA
    Clin Plast Surg; 2012 Apr; 39(2):187-216. PubMed ID: 22482360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Concepts in aesthetic breast dimensions: analysis of the ideal breast.
    Mallucci P; Branford OA
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Jan; 65(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 21868295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A computational tool for preoperative breast augmentation planning in aesthetic plastic surgery.
    Georgii J; Eder M; Bürger K; Klotz S; Ferstl F; Kovacs L; Westermann R
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2014 May; 18(3):907-19. PubMed ID: 24132029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The BREAST-V: a unifying predictive formula for volume assessment in small, medium, and large breasts.
    Longo B; Farcomeni A; Ferri G; Campanale A; Sorotos M; Santanelli F
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Jul; 132(1):1e-7e. PubMed ID: 23806950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Invited commentary: Ideal anthropomorphic values of the female breast: correlation of pluralistic aesthetic evaluation with objective measurements.
    Schwarz GS; Zins JE
    Ann Plast Surg; 2011 Jul; 67(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 21372672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.