These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20048662)

  • 1. The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
    Andreae MH
    Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2010; 35(1):115-6; author reply 116. PubMed ID: 20048662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Workshop 11-sources of bias in studies of systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis.
    Yu IT; Tse SL
    Hong Kong Med J; 2013 Apr; 19(2):156-8. PubMed ID: 23535676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Capture-recapture is a potentially useful method for assessing publication bias.
    Bennett DA; Latham NK; Stretton C; Anderson CS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 57(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 15135835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Systematic reviews of meta-analyses: applications and limitations.
    Delgado-Rodríguez M
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2006 Feb; 60(2):90-2. PubMed ID: 16415253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Handoll HH; Gillespie LD; Gillespie WJ; Howe TE; Madhok R; Parker MJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 May; (422):272; author reply 273-4. PubMed ID: 15187871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Therapeutic decisions based on meta analyses].
    Komossa K; Kissling W; Leucht S; Möller HJ
    Psychiatr Prax; 2008 Nov; 35(8):373-5. PubMed ID: 19016212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical methods can be improved within Cochrane pregnancy and childbirth reviews.
    Riley RD; Gates S; Neilson J; Alfirevic Z
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Jun; 64(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 21109399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias.
    Guyatt GH; Oxman AD; Montori V; Vist G; Kunz R; Brozek J; Alonso-Coello P; Djulbegovic B; Atkins D; Falck-Ytter Y; Williams JW; Meerpohl J; Norris SL; Akl EA; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 64(12):1277-82. PubMed ID: 21802904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What is publication bias in a meta-analysis?
    Sedgwick P
    BMJ; 2015 Aug; 351():h4419. PubMed ID: 26276792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Complementary medicine and the Cochrane Collaboration.
    Ezzo J; Berman BM; Vickers AJ; Linde K
    JAMA; 1998 Nov; 280(18):1628-30. PubMed ID: 9820271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical methods for dealing with publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Jin ZC; Zhou XH; He J
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):343-60. PubMed ID: 25363575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Montori VM; Swiontkowski MF; Cook DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):43-54. PubMed ID: 12897595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
    Hughes EG
    Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1996 May; 14(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 8796939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic reviews of surgical interventions.
    Burton M; Clarke M
    Surg Clin North Am; 2006 Feb; 86(1):101-14, ix. PubMed ID: 16442423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence-based oral and maxillofacial surgery: some pitfalls and limitations.
    Pitak-Arnnop P; Hemprich A; Pausch NC
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 69(1):252-7. PubMed ID: 21050635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Irony and the Elephant in the Review.
    Grocott HP; Deutscher R
    Anesth Analg; 2017 May; 124(5):1736-1737. PubMed ID: 28319518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Publication bias.
    Parmley WW
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Nov; 24(5):1424-5. PubMed ID: 7930269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Prospectively identified trials could be used for comparison with meta-analyses.
    Langhorne P
    BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7129):471. PubMed ID: 9492689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Researcher allegiance in psychotherapy outcome research: an overview of reviews.
    Munder T; Brütsch O; Leonhart R; Gerger H; Barth J
    Clin Psychol Rev; 2013 Jun; 33(4):501-11. PubMed ID: 23500154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.