These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20049773)

  • 1. The public acceptance of nanomedicine: a personal perspective.
    Berube DM
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol; 2009; 1(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 20049773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The perception of nanotechnology and nanomedicine: a worldwide social media study.
    Sechi G; Bedognetti D; Sgarrella F; Van Eperen L; Marincola FM; Bianco A; Delogu LG
    Nanomedicine (Lond); 2014 Jul; 9(10):1475-86. PubMed ID: 25253496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Public optimism towards nanomedicine.
    Bottini M; Rosato N; Gloria F; Adanti S; Corradino N; Bergamaschi A; Magrini A
    Int J Nanomedicine; 2011; 6():3473-85. PubMed ID: 22267931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Defining Nano, Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine: Why Should It Matter?
    Satalkar P; Elger BS; Shaw DM
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Oct; 22(5):1255-1276. PubMed ID: 26373718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Knowledge, Perceptions, and Attitudes of Medical Residents Towards Nanomedicine: Defining the Gap.
    Nassani N; El-Douaihy Y; Khotsyna Y; Shwe T; El-Sayegh S
    Med Sci Educ; 2020 Mar; 30(1):179-186. PubMed ID: 34457657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nanotechnology in Dutch science cafés: Public risk perceptions contextualised.
    Dijkstra AM; Critchley CR
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Jan; 25(1):71-87. PubMed ID: 24812210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptions of racial and ethnic differences in access to healthcare.
    Seils DM; Schulman KA
    N C Med J; 2004; 65(6):350-2. PubMed ID: 15714723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Belief in public efficacy, trust, and attitudes toward modern genetic science.
    Barnett J; Cooper H; Senior V
    Risk Anal; 2007 Aug; 27(4):921-33. PubMed ID: 17958501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The scrutiny of cardiac imaging and the need to restore patient trust.
    Mieres JH
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2009; 16(1):158-60. PubMed ID: 19152142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Explaining things to an angry managed-care patient.
    Lowes RL
    Med Econ; 1997 Apr; 74(8):143-4, 146, 149-50 passim. PubMed ID: 10166512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Public Engagement and Nanotechnology in Australia.
    Dalton-Brown S
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2016 Jul; 25(3):518-25. PubMed ID: 27348837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fairness and nanotechnology concern.
    McComas KA; Besley JC
    Risk Anal; 2011 Nov; 31(11):1749-61. PubMed ID: 21883336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Toward the emergence of nanoneurosurgery: part III--nanomedicine: targeted nanotherapy, nanosurgery, and progress toward the realization of nanoneurosurgery.
    Leary SP; Liu CY; Apuzzo ML
    Neurosurgery; 2006 Jun; 58(6):1009-26; discussion 1009-26. PubMed ID: 16723880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptions of risk and optimistic bias for acute gastrointestinal illness: a population survey.
    Sargeant JM; Majowicz SE; Sheth U; Edge VL
    Zoonoses Public Health; 2010 Dec; 57(7-8):e177-83. PubMed ID: 20202184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Commentary: Public outreach by the FDA: evaluating oversight of human drugs and medical devices.
    Frankel MS
    J Law Med Ethics; 2009; 37(4):625-8. PubMed ID: 20122104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attitude Towards Health Information Privacy and Electronic Health Records Among Urban Sri Lankan Adults.
    Tissera SR; Silva SN
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 225():1003-4. PubMed ID: 27332453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Correlations between television viewing, attitudes toward the mentally ill and psychiatric professionals, and willingness to seek therapy].
    Németh E
    Psychiatr Hung; 2009; 24(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 19667424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceived risks and perceived benefits of different nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packaging.
    Siegrist M; Stampfli N; Kastenholz H; Keller C
    Appetite; 2008 Sep; 51(2):283-90. PubMed ID: 18406006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laypeople's and experts' perception of nanotechnology hazards.
    Siegrist M; Keller C; Kastenholz H; Frey S; Wiek A
    Risk Anal; 2007 Feb; 27(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 17362400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In the public's view.... Quashing the MMR hype: can we overcome the media's influence?
    Goodman NW
    Hosp Med; 2001 Feb; 62(2):119. PubMed ID: 11236617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.