These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20050394)

  • 1. Information from the voice fundamental frequency (F0) region accounts for the majority of the benefit when acoustic stimulation is added to electric stimulation.
    Zhang T; Dorman MF; Spahr AJ
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 20050394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency overlap between electric and acoustic stimulation and speech-perception benefit in patients with combined electric and acoustic stimulation.
    Zhang T; Spahr AJ; Dorman MF
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 19915474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of frequency compression by cochlear implant recipients with postoperative acoustic hearing.
    McDermott H; Henshall K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jun; 21(6):380-9. PubMed ID: 20701835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.
    Carroll J; Tiaden S; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2054-62. PubMed ID: 21973360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Achieving electric-acoustic benefit with a modulated tone.
    Brown CA; Bacon SP
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 19546806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does acoustic fundamental frequency information enhance cochlear implant performance?
    Mulhern L; Cullington H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Mar; 15(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 24597637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combining acoustic and electric stimulation in the service of speech recognition.
    Dorman MF; Gifford RH
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Dec; 49(12):912-9. PubMed ID: 20874053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The perception of telephone-processed speech by combined electric and acoustic stimulation.
    Hu Y; Tahmina Q; Runge C; Friedland DR
    Trends Amplif; 2013; 17(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 24265213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Simulation of speech perception with cochlear implants : Influence of frequency and level of fundamental frequency components with electronic acoustic stimulation].
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    HNO; 2017 Mar; 65(3):237-242. PubMed ID: 27670421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory training in patients with unilateral cochlear implant and contralateral acoustic stimulation.
    Zhang T; Dorman MF; Fu QJ; Spahr AJ
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):e70-9. PubMed ID: 22622705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Beneficial acoustic speech cues for cochlear implant users with residual acoustic hearing.
    Visram AS; Azadpour M; Kluk K; McKay CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 May; 131(5):4042-50. PubMed ID: 22559377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bimodal hearing benefit for speech recognition with competing voice in cochlear implant subject with normal hearing in contralateral ear.
    Cullington HE; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):70-3. PubMed ID: 19858722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation With Hearing Preservation: Effect of Cochlear Implant Low-Frequency Cutoff on Speech Understanding and Perceived Listening Difficulty.
    Gifford RH; Davis TJ; Sunderhaus LW; Menapace C; Buck B; Crosson J; O'Neill L; Beiter A; Segel P
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):539-553. PubMed ID: 28301392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electric and acoustic harmonic integration predicts speech-in-noise performance in hybrid cochlear implant users.
    Bonnard D; Schwalje A; Gantz B; Choi I
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():223-230. PubMed ID: 29980380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of first formant information in simulated electro-acoustic hearing.
    Verschuur C; Boland C; Frost E; Constable J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):4279-89. PubMed ID: 23742378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shifting Fundamental Frequency in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Listening: Effects of F0 Variation.
    Brown CA; Helms Tillery K; Apoux F; Doyle NM; Bacon SP
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):e18-25. PubMed ID: 26565786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.