BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20050399)

  • 1. Universal Protocol becomes less prescriptive in its 2010 version.
    OR Manager; 2009 Dec; 25(12):1, 6-7. PubMed ID: 20050399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Universal Protocol won't change for now.
    OR Manager; 2007 Aug; 23(8):5. PubMed ID: 17824509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wrong site surgery and the Universal Protocol.
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 2006 Nov; 91(11):63. PubMed ID: 18557441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minnesota takes extra steps on wrong surgery, retained items.
    OR Manager; 2005 Apr; 21(4):1, 18-20. PubMed ID: 15909366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preoperative communication to improve safety: a literature review.
    Penprase B; Elstun L; Ferguson C; Schaper M; Tiller C
    Nurs Manage; 2010 Nov; 41(11):18-24; quiz 24-5. PubMed ID: 20966789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revisiting the universal protocol.
    Banschbach SK
    AORN J; 2009 Feb; 89(2):257-9. PubMed ID: 19200460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implementing the universal protocol.
    Watson DS
    AORN J; 2009 Aug; 90(2):283-7. PubMed ID: 19664421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. JCAHO's universal protocol released to widespread endorsement.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Feb; 24(2):1-4. PubMed ID: 14994461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Who should mark the surgical site?
    OR Manager; 2004 Jan; 20(1):7. PubMed ID: 14740470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Approved: revisions to 2007 National Patient Safety Goals and Universal Protocol.
    Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2007 Mar; 27(3):5-6. PubMed ID: 17416142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditing and improving the sponge count process.
    Farrell V; Higbie V; Cleveland S
    OR Manager; 2003 Mar; 19(3):13-4. PubMed ID: 12661500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marking the site for spinal surgery.
    OR Manager; 2004 Jan; 20(1):9. PubMed ID: 14740472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Handoffs: lessons from other industries.
    Patterson E
    OR Manager; 2005 Aug; 21(8):11-2. PubMed ID: 16146178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient safety. A prescription for certainty: a new wrong site surgery protocol.
    Larson L
    Trustee; 2004 Apr; 57(4):30-1. PubMed ID: 15119064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sentinel events.
    Watson DS
    AORN J; 2009 Dec; 90(6):926-9. PubMed ID: 19961981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using safety tools to prevent system-related errors.
    Voight PE
    AORN J; 2009 Jun; 89(6):969-70. PubMed ID: 19500696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. International patient safety goals created.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 Feb; 26(2):8. PubMed ID: 17001807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medical errors: root cause analysis.
    Spath P
    OR Manager; 1998 Sep; 14(9):38, 40-1. PubMed ID: 10185635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Timeout: it's as easy as apple pie!
    Bennett C
    OR Manager; 2007 Jul; 23(7):14. PubMed ID: 17708193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effective strategies to comply with Joint Commission's universal protocol.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2003 Nov; 28(11):149-51. PubMed ID: 14601528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.