164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20050733)
21. Comparison of digital intraoral scanners and alginate impressions: Time and patient satisfaction.
Burzynski JA; Firestone AR; Beck FM; Fields HW; Deguchi T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):534-541. PubMed ID: 29602345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Exploring a new method for superimposition of pre-treatment and post-treatment mandibular digital dental casts in adults].
Dai FF; Liu Y; Xu TM; Chen G
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Apr; 50(2):271-278. PubMed ID: 29643526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and direct measurement in the examination of the mandibular canal and adjacent structures.
Kim TS; Caruso JM; Christensen H; Torabinejad M
J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1191-4. PubMed ID: 20630297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of Cone-beam Computed Tomography and Multi-slice Spiral Computed Tomography Bone Density Measurements in the Maxilla and Mandible.
Doyle S; Wiltz MJ; Kraut RA
N Y State Dent J; 2015; 81(4):42-5. PubMed ID: 26373034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.
Kumar V; Ludlow J; Soares Cevidanes LH; Mol A
Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):873-9. PubMed ID: 18298214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Preliminary cone-beam computed tomography study evaluating dental and skeletal changes after treatment with a mandibular Schwarz appliance.
Tai K; Hotokezaka H; Park JH; Tai H; Miyajima K; Choi M; Kai LM; Mishima K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):262.e1-262.e11; discussion 262-3. PubMed ID: 20816294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Use of cone beam computed tomography and a laser intraoral scanner in virtual dental implant surgery: part 1.
Lee CY; Ganz SD; Wong N; Suzuki JB
Implant Dent; 2012 Aug; 21(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 22814549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Digital models vs plaster models using alginate and alginate substitute materials.
Torassian G; Kau CH; English JD; Powers J; Bussa HI; Marie Salas-Lopez A; Corbett JA
Angle Orthod; 2010 Jul; 80(4):474-81. PubMed ID: 20482351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of linear and angular changes assessed in digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography.
Massaro C; Losada C; Cevidanes L; Yatabe M; Garib D; Lauris JRP; Ioshida M; Rey D; Alvarez MA; Benavides E; Rios H; Aristizabal JF; Ruellas AC
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2020 Feb; 23(1):118-128. PubMed ID: 31628885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of masseter muscle morphology in different types of malocclusions using cone beam computed tomography.
Becht MP; Mah J; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 24456631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Model Analysis of Digital Models in Moderate to Severe Crowding: In Vivo Validation and Clinical Application.
Yoon JH; Yu HS; Choi Y; Choi TH; Choi SH; Cha JY
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():8414605. PubMed ID: 29568766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Monitoring of typodont root movement via crown superimposition of single cone-beam computed tomography and consecutive intraoral scans.
Lee RJ; Pham J; Choy M; Weissheimer A; Dougherty HL; Sameshima GT; Tong H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):399-409. PubMed ID: 24582031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of length and location of edentulous area on the accuracy of prosthetic treatment plan incorporation into cone-beam computed tomography scans.
Jamjoom FZ; Kim DG; Lee DJ; McGlumphy EA; Yilmaz B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 20(3):300-307. PubMed ID: 29399999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A cone-beam computed tomography triple scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning.
Swennen GR; Mollemans W; De Clercq C; Abeloos J; Lamoral P; Lippens F; Neyt N; Casselman J; Schutyser F
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 19276829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparative study of the pharyngeal airway space, measured with cone beam computed tomography, between patients with different craniofacial morphologies.
Dalmau E; Zamora N; Tarazona B; Gandia JL; Paredes V
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 43(8):1438-46. PubMed ID: 26189145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning.
Gül Amuk N; Karsli E; Kurt G
Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 30772351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cone Beam Computed Tomography-based Evaluation of the Anterior Teeth Position Changes obtained by Passive Self-ligating Brackets.
Rhoden FK; Maltagliati LÁ; de Castro Ferreira Conti AC; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Filho LC; de Almeida Cardoso M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Aug; 17(8):623-9. PubMed ID: 27659077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Three-dimensional evaluation of mandibular anterior dental crowding in digital dental casts.
Fernandes LQP; Nunes LKF; Alves LS; Ribeiro FAC; Capelli J
Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(3):64-71. PubMed ID: 28746489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
