These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20051208)

  • 1. Microbiological sampling of carcasses by excision or swabbing with three types of sponge or gauze.
    Martínez B; Celda MF; Anastasio B; García I; López-Mendoza MC
    J Food Prot; 2010 Jan; 73(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20051208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microbiological sampling of swine carcasses: a comparison of data obtained by swabbing with medical gauze and data collected routinely by excision at Swedish abattoirs.
    Lindblad M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 118(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 17706823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microbiological carcass sampling methods to achieve compliance with 2001/471/EC and new hygiene regulations.
    Byrne B; Dunne G; Lyng J; Bolton DJ
    Res Microbiol; 2005; 156(1):104-6. PubMed ID: 15636754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of experience with swabbing procedures on the numbers of bacteria recovered from carcasses by swabbing with sponges.
    Gill CO; Badoni M
    J Food Prot; 2010 Apr; 73(4):747-51. PubMed ID: 20377966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of wet-dry swabbing and excision sampling methods for microbiological testing of bovine, porcine, and ovine carcasses at red meat slaughterhouses.
    Hutchison ML; Walters LD; Avery SM; Reid CA; Wilson D; Howell M; Johnston AM; Buncic S
    J Food Prot; 2005 Oct; 68(10):2155-62. PubMed ID: 16245723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Excision vs sponge swabbing - a comparison of methods for the microbiological sampling of beef, pork and lamb carcasses.
    Pearce RA; Bolton DJ
    J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 98(4):896-900. PubMed ID: 15752336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microbial contamination on beef in relation to hygiene assessment based on criteria used in EU Decision 2001/471/EC.
    McEvoy JM; Sheridan JJ; Blair IS; McDowell DA
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 92(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 15109799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in vitro system for the comparison of excision and wet-dry swabbing for microbiological sampling of beef carcasses.
    Cenci-Goga BT; Miraglia D; Ranucci D; Branciari R; Budelli L; McCrindle CM; Cioffi A; Mammoli R
    J Food Prot; 2007 Apr; 70(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 17477263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hygienic Status Assessment of Two Lamb Slaughterhouses in Spain.
    Alonso-Calleja C; Guerrero-Ramos E; Capita R
    J Food Prot; 2017 Jul; 80(7):1152-1158. PubMed ID: 28598204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experimental comparison of excision and swabbing microbiological sampling methods for carcasses.
    Pepperell R; Reid CA; Solano SN; Hutchison ML; Walters LD; Johnston AM; Buncic S
    J Food Prot; 2005 Oct; 68(10):2163-8. PubMed ID: 16245724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trends in the microbial contamination of bovine, ovine and swine carcasses in three small-scale abattoirs in central Italy: A four-year monitoring.
    Petruzzelli A; Osimani A; Pasquini M; Clementi F; Vetrano V; Paolini F; Foglini M; Micci E; Paoloni A; Tonucci F
    Meat Sci; 2016 Jan; 111():53-9. PubMed ID: 26340741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hygiene indicator microorganisms for selected pathogens on beef, pork, and poultry meats in Belgium.
    Ghafir Y; China B; Dierick K; De Zutter L; Daube G
    J Food Prot; 2008 Jan; 71(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 18236660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the hygiene of pig carcasses using whole-body carcass swabs compared with the four-site method in EC Decision 471.
    O'Brien SB; Lenahan M; Sweeney T; Sheridan JJ
    J Food Prot; 2007 Feb; 70(2):432-9. PubMed ID: 17340880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microbiological contamination of pig carcasses at different stages of slaughter in two European Union-approved abattoirs.
    Spescha C; Stephan R; Zweifel C
    J Food Prot; 2006 Nov; 69(11):2568-75. PubMed ID: 17133797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of slaughterhouse and day of sample on the probability of a pig carcass being Salmonella-positive according to the Enterobacteriaceae count in the largest Brazilian pork production region.
    Corbellini LG; Júnior AB; de Freitas Costa E; Duarte AS; Albuquerque ER; Kich JD; Cardoso M; Nauta M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2016 Jul; 228():58-66. PubMed ID: 27107299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An assessment of sampling methods and microbiological hygiene indicators for process verification in poultry slaughterhouses.
    Hutchison ML; Walters LD; Mead GC; Howell M; Allen VM
    J Food Prot; 2006 Jan; 69(1):145-53. PubMed ID: 16416912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aerobic Mesophilic, Coliform,
    Jaja IF; Green E; Muchenje V
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Apr; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 29690529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of bacterial superficial contamination in classical or ritually slaughtered cattle using metagenetics and microbiological analysis.
    Korsak N; Taminiau B; Hupperts C; Delhalle L; Nezer C; Delcenserie V; Daube G
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2017 Apr; 247():79-86. PubMed ID: 27756497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microbiological sampling of meat cuts and manufacturing beef by excision or swabbing.
    Gill CO; Badoni M; McGinnis JC
    J Food Prot; 2001 Mar; 64(3):325-34. PubMed ID: 11252475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microbiological contamination of cattle carcasses at different stages of slaughter in two abattoirs.
    Zweifel C; Capek M; Stephan R
    Meat Sci; 2014 Oct; 98(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 24967539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.