These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20051425)

  • 1. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention by magnetic navigation compared with conventional wire technique.
    Patterson MS; Dirksen MT; Ijsselmuiden AJ; Amoroso G; Slagboom T; Laarman GJ; Schultz C; van Domburg RT; Serruys PW; Kiemeneij F
    Eur Heart J; 2011 Jun; 32(12):1472-8. PubMed ID: 20051425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of magnetically navigated and conventional wire percutaneous coronary intervention of a single discrete stenosis.
    Patterson MS; van Nooijen F; Ijsselmuiden A; Dirksen M; Van Domburg R; Serruys P; Kiemeneij F
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Nov; 74(5):693-9. PubMed ID: 19496121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Initial experience with a magnetic navigation system for invasive treatment in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.
    Wang H; Li C; Wang L; Yang Z; Cao K
    J Interv Cardiol; 2011 Dec; 24(6):549-54. PubMed ID: 21883473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized comparison of the magnetic navigation system vs. standard wires in the treatment of bifurcations.
    Ramcharitar S; van der Giessen WJ; van der Ent M; Serruys PW; van Geuns RJ
    Eur Heart J; 2011 Jun; 32(12):1479-83. PubMed ID: 20439262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of procedural times, success rates, and safety between left versus right radial arterial access in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
    Larsen P; Shah S; Waxman S; Freilich M; Riskalla N; Piemonte T; Jeon C; Pyne C
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Jul; 78(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 20939041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnetic navigation system and CT roadmap-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: a comparison to the conventional approach.
    Hao R; Zhang Q; Xu Z; Tang L; Yang Z; Cao K; Li C
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2013 Apr; 25(4):177-81. PubMed ID: 23549490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic navigation system assisted stenting of coronary bifurcation lesions.
    Simsek C; Magro M; Patterson MS; Onuma Y; Ciampichetti I; van Weenen S; van Domburg RT; Serruys PW; Boersma E; van Geuns RJ
    EuroIntervention; 2011 Mar; 6(8):970-6. PubMed ID: 21330245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Direct ambulance transport to catheterization laboratory reduces door-to-balloon time in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the DIRECT-STEMI study.
    Qiu JP; Zhang Q; Lu JD; Wang HR; Lin J; Ge ZR; Zhang RY; Shen WF
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Mar; 124(6):805-10. PubMed ID: 21518584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetically navigated percutaneous coronary intervention in distal and/or complex lesions may improve procedural outcome and material consumption.
    IJsselmuiden AJ; Patterson MS; van Nooijen FC; Tangelder GJ; Dirksen MT; Amoroso G; Slagboom T; Serruys PW; Laarman GJ; Kiemeneij F
    EuroIntervention; 2009 Jan; 4(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 19284075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Direct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarct treated at the Cardiac Center of the General Medical School Hospital in Prague: a 1-year retrospective study].
    Holm F; Kovárník T; Aschermann M; Simek S; Linhart A; Humhal J; Skulec R; Reznícek V
    Vnitr Lek; 2002 May; 48(5):373-9. PubMed ID: 12061202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison of the antithrombotlic effect and safety between intravenous nadroparin and unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention].
    Zhu JH; Qiu YG; Chen JZ; Zhang FR; Fu GS; Shen FR; Huang WJ; Wang JA; Zhao LL; Tao QM; Zheng LR
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2005 Apr; 33(4):335-9. PubMed ID: 15932664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized comparison of the magnetic navigation system versus conventional percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Ramcharitar S; van Geuns RJ; Patterson M; van der Giessen WJ; van der Ent M; van Domburg RT; Serruys PW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Nov; 72(6):761-70. PubMed ID: 18798236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST elevation myocardial infarction and high-risk patients: experience in a single centre without cardiothoracic surgical backup.
    Chow J; Tan CH; Ong SH; Goh YS; Gan HW; Tan VH; Chai SC
    Singapore Med J; 2011 Apr; 52(4):257-62. PubMed ID: 21552786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the resource utilization between simultaneous strategy and staged strategy to treat two-vessel coronary artery disease by percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Sakakura K; Ako J; Wada H; Kubo N; Momomura S
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2011 Nov; 23(11):454-9. PubMed ID: 22045077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Efficacy and outcome of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction due to saphenous vein graft occlusion].
    Ergelen M; Uyarel H; Gül M; Türer A; Yıldırım E; Bozbay M; Demirci D; Ersan D; Türkkan C; Uluganyan M; Tezel T
    Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2010 Dec; 38(8):531-6. PubMed ID: 21248452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized comparison of manual versus mechanical thrombus removal in primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (TREAT-MI).
    Vink MA; Patterson MS; van Etten J; Ijsselmuiden AJ; Dirksen MT; Amoroso G; Slagboom T; Laarman G; Kiemeneij F
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Jul; 78(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 21681888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective multicenter randomized trial comparing physician versus patient transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
    Zhang Q; Zhang RY; Qiu JP; Zhang JF; Wang XL; Jiang L; Liao ML; Zhang JS; Hu J; Yang ZK; Shen WF
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Mar; 121(6):485-91. PubMed ID: 18364130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The comparison of early and late outcome of direct and conventional stenting of patients with st elevation myocardial infarction.
    Tacoy G; Yazici GE; Erden M; Timurkaynak T
    Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis; 2009 Jun; 3(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 19465441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical benefits of adjunctive tirofiban therapy in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Shen J; Zhang Q; Zhang RY; Zhang JS; Hu J; Yang ZK; Zheng AF; Zhang X; Shen WF
    Coron Artery Dis; 2008 Jun; 19(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 18480672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transradial primary angioplasty and stenting in Indian patients with acute myocardial infarction: acute results and 6-month follow-up.
    Ranjan A; Patel TM; Shah SC; Malhotra H; Patel R; Vayada N; Pothiwala R; Fonseca K; Tanwar NS
    Indian Heart J; 2005; 57(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 16521638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.