156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20051600)
1. Academic misconduct and detection.
Wood BD
Radiol Technol; 2010; 81(3):276-9. PubMed ID: 20051600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the perceived prevalence of research fraud among faculty at research-intensive universities in the USA.
Reisig MD; Holtfreter K; Berzofsky ME
Account Res; 2020 Oct; 27(7):457-475. PubMed ID: 32438829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. With those pressures, there have been more cases of plagiarism, scientific fraud and misconduct.
Eccles S; Irimura T; Welch D
Clin Exp Metastasis; 2009; 26(1):1. PubMed ID: 19089592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Stat bite: Types of research misconduct.
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Jan; 100(1):8. PubMed ID: 18159064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Frequent cases force China to face up to scientific fraud.
Jia H
Nat Med; 2006 Aug; 12(8):867. PubMed ID: 16892019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Data falsification and question on academic integrity.
Nurunnabi M; Hossain MA
Account Res; 2019 Feb; 26(2):108-122. PubMed ID: 30595069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Walters and Richards comment on the examination of terminal digits of questioned data as used by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the Public Health Service in misconduct cases.
Mosimann JE
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(6):8-9; author reply 9-11. PubMed ID: 12613205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ruling brings cash windfall in US fraud case.
Dalton R
Nature; 1995 May; 375(6529):270. PubMed ID: 7753183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Fraud, not error, is why two thirds of biomedical papers are withdrawn.
Roehr B
BMJ; 2012 Oct; 345():e6658. PubMed ID: 23033379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Clamp down on copycats.
Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7064):2. PubMed ID: 16267511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Academic misconduct of graduates and the credit education].
Bi X; Tang X; Fan X
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Oct; 36(10):1021-4. PubMed ID: 22086012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sociology. Scientific misconduct: do the punishments fit the crime?
Redman BK; Merz JF
Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5890):775. PubMed ID: 18687942
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Five ways China must cultivate research integrity.
Tang L
Nature; 2019 Nov; 575(7784):589-591. PubMed ID: 31768041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Plagiarism and other scientific misconducts.
Höffken K; Gabbert H
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2009 Mar; 135(3):327-8. PubMed ID: 19125293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Congressman launches plagiarism inquiry.
Macilwain C
Nature; 1998 Mar; 392(6672):113. PubMed ID: 9515946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Scientific fraud. A disease we find among ourselves].
Guimarães S
Acta Med Port; 1998; 11(8-9):783-5. PubMed ID: 9951073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Your mission is ... academic fraud and theft are a growing problem as researchers struggle to keep to an ethical code that is never talked about. Now some of science's top names are taking up the fight to keep the profession honest.
Cohen P
New Sci; 1999 Jul; 162(2193):38-41. PubMed ID: 11657935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Policing integrity.
Nature; 2005 May; 435(7040):248. PubMed ID: 15902211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Scientific misconduct. How prevalent is fraud? That's a million-dollar question.
Marshall E
Science; 2000 Dec; 290(5497):1662-3. PubMed ID: 11186377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ESH statement on detection and punishment of abstract fraud and poster plagiarism.
Kjeldsen SE; Narkiewicz K; Cifková R; Mancia G
Blood Press; 2005; 14(6):322-3. PubMed ID: 16403685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
