BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

520 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20051923)

  • 1. A Comparison of fixed-hole and slotted-hole dynamic plates for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
    Hong SW; Lee SH; Khoo LT; Yoon SH; Holly LT; Shamie AN; Wang JC
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Feb; 23(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 20051923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implant complications, fusion, loss of lordosis, and outcome after anterior cervical plating with dynamic or rigid plates: two-year results of a multi-centric, randomized, controlled study.
    Pitzen TR; Chrobok J; Stulik J; Ruffing S; Drumm J; Sova L; Kucera R; Vyskocil T; Steudel WI
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 19287352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic plates in anterior cervical fusion surgery: graft settling and cervical alignment.
    Ghahreman A; Rao PJ; Ferch RD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1567-71. PubMed ID: 19564766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of anterior cervical fusion after two-level discectomy or single-level corpectomy: sagittal alignment, cervical lordosis, graft collapse, and adjacent-level ossification.
    Park Y; Maeda T; Cho W; Riew KD
    Spine J; 2010 Mar; 10(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 19850532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Increased fusion rates with cervical plating for three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
    Wang JC; McDonough PW; Kanim LE; Endow KK; Delamarter RB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Mar; 26(6):643-6; discussion 646-7. PubMed ID: 11246376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of patella allograft for anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion.
    Jensen WK; Moore TA; Tribus CB; Anderson PA; Zdeblick TA
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Aug; 22(6):392-8. PubMed ID: 19652563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Monosegmental spinal fusion: ventral cervical plates-- dynamic or static joint stability?].
    Beck M
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2009; 147(4):409. PubMed ID: 19693732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stand-alone interbody cage versus anterior cervical plate for treatment of cervical disc herniation: sequential changes in cage subsidence.
    Fujibayashi S; Neo M; Nakamura T
    J Clin Neurosci; 2008 Sep; 15(9):1017-22. PubMed ID: 18653347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of bioresorbable and titanium plates in cervical spinal fusion: early radiologic and clinical results.
    Nabhan A; Ishak B; Steimer O; Zimmer A; Pitzen T; Steudel WI; Pape D
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 May; 22(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 19412016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short-term comparison of cervical fusion with static and dynamic plating using computerized motion analysis.
    Goldberg G; Albert TJ; Vaccaro AR; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Wharton N
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jun; 32(13):E371-5. PubMed ID: 17545900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
    Sasso RC; Best NM
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-level anterior cervical discectomy versus one-level corpectomy in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Oh MC; Zhang HY; Park JY; Kim KS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(7):692-6. PubMed ID: 19333101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The efficacy of the synthetic interbody cage and Grafton for anterior cervical fusion.
    Park HW; Lee JK; Moon SJ; Seo SK; Lee JH; Kim SH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(17):E591-5. PubMed ID: 19644317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment of multilevel cervical fusion with cages.
    Cho DY; Lee WY; Sheu PC
    Surg Neurol; 2004 Nov; 62(5):378-85, discussion 385-6. PubMed ID: 15518835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative analysis of 3 different construct systems for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: stand-alone cage, iliac graft plus plate augmentation, and cage plus plating.
    Lee CH; Hyun SJ; Kim MJ; Yeom JS; Kim WH; Kim KJ; Jahng TA; Kim HJ; Yoon SH
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Apr; 26(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 23027363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preliminary comparison of radiolucent cages containing either autogenous cancellous bone or hydroxyapatite graft in multilevel cervical fusion.
    Chang WC; Tsou HK; Chen WS; Chen CC; Shen CC
    J Clin Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 16(6):793-6. PubMed ID: 19299139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical adjacent-segment pathology after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results after a minimum of 10-year follow-up.
    Chung JY; Kim SK; Jung ST; Lee KB
    Spine J; 2014 Oct; 14(10):2290-8. PubMed ID: 24462531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anterior cervical microdiscectomy with or without fusion.
    Oktenoglu T; Cosar M; Ozer AF; Iplikcioglu C; Sasani M; Canbulat N; Bavbek C; Sarioglu AC
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Jul; 20(5):361-8. PubMed ID: 17607101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors affecting sagittal malalignment due to cage subsidence in standalone cage assisted anterior cervical fusion.
    Barsa P; Suchomel P
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Sep; 16(9):1395-400. PubMed ID: 17221174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long term outcome of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using coral grafts.
    Ramzi N; Ribeiro-Vaz G; Fomekong E; Lecouvet FE; Raftopoulos C
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2008 Dec; 150(12):1249-56; discussion 1256. PubMed ID: 19002374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.