These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20052663)

  • 41. Accuracy of ultrasonic fetal weight estimation and detection of small for gestational age fetuses.
    Palo P; Erkkola R; Piiroinen O; Ruotsalainen P
    Am J Perinatol; 1989 Oct; 6(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 2675872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Fetal weight estimation by 2D and 3D ultrasound: comparison of six formulas.
    Hasenoehrl G; Pohlhammer A; Gruber R; Staudach A; Steiner H
    Ultraschall Med; 2009 Dec; 30(6):585-90. PubMed ID: 19544232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Ultrasonic prediction of term birth weight in Hispanic women. Accuracy in an outpatient clinic.
    Nahum GG; Pham KQ; McHugh JP
    J Reprod Med; 2003 Jan; 48(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 12611089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. How soon can I be proficient in embryo transfer? Lessons from the cumulative summation test for learning curve (LC-CUSUM).
    Dessolle L; Fréour T; Barrière P; Jean M; Ravel C; Daraï E; Biau DJ
    Hum Reprod; 2010 Feb; 25(2):380-6. PubMed ID: 19923166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [The use of Rossavik's mathematical model in determining individual intrauterine growth curves. Our experience].
    Biagiotti R; Brizzi L; Cariati E; Puliga AS; Nannini R
    Minerva Ginecol; 1994 Mar; 46(3):81-4. PubMed ID: 8015703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Fetal ultrasound biometry for pregnant population in the County of Primorje-Gorski Kotar (Croatia).
    Frančišković V; Zaputović S; Krajina R; Petrović O
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Oct; 24(10):1277-82. PubMed ID: 21265720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Prediction of birth weight by ultrasound in Turkish population. Which formula should be used in Turkey to estimate fetal weight?
    Donma MM; Donma O; Sonmez S
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 31(12):1577-81. PubMed ID: 16344119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Biometry and fetal weight estimation by two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasonography: an intraobserver and interobserver reliability and agreement study.
    Lima JC; Miyague AH; Filho FM; Nastri CO; Martins WP
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 40(2):186-93. PubMed ID: 22102507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Sex-specific antenatal reference growth charts for uncomplicated singleton pregnancies at 15-40 weeks of gestation.
    Schwärzler P; Bland JM; Holden D; Campbell S; Ville Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 23(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 14970994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Estimation of fetal weight: reference range at 20-36 weeks' gestation and comparison with actual birth-weight reference range.
    Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Ville Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):550-5. PubMed ID: 17444561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Sex-specific fetal weight prediction by ultrasound.
    Schild RL; Sachs C; Fimmers R; Gembruch U; Hansmann M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 14970995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Fetal biometry: a comparison between experienced sonographers and automated measurements.
    Zalud I; Good S; Carneiro G; Georgescu B; Aoki K; Green L; Shahrestani F; Okumura R
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2009 Jan; 22(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 19165678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Revisiting first-trimester fetal biometry.
    Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Duyme M; Dorion A; Ville Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 22(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 12858306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. New sonographic method for fetuses with small abdominal circumference improves fetal weight estimation.
    Kehl S; Körber C; Hart N; Goecke TW; Schild RL; Siemer J
    Ultraschall Med; 2012 Oct; 33(5):469-73. PubMed ID: 21630187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The importance of quality management in fetal measurement.
    Dudley NJ; Chapman E
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 19(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 11876814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation of fetuses with a birth weight of 1500 g or less.
    Abele H; Hoopmann M; Wagner N; Hahn M; Wallwiener D; Kagan KO
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Dec; 153(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 20675035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Fetal biometry to assess the size and growth of the fetus.
    O'Gorman N; Salomon LJ
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 May; 49():3-15. PubMed ID: 29605157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Fetal ultrasound biometry: normative charts for a Puerto Rican population.
    de la Vega A; Ruiz-Febo N; Roberts ZC
    P R Health Sci J; 2008 Mar; 27(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 18450238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Quality control for intravascular intrauterine transfusion using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis for the monitoring of individual performance.
    Lindenburg IT; Wolterbeek R; Oepkes D; Klumper FJ; Vandenbussche FP; van Kamp IL
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2011; 29(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 21304232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Clinical implications of machine-probe combinations on obstetric ultrasound measurements used in pregnancy dating.
    Axell R; Lynch C; Chudleigh T; Bradshaw L; Mangat J; White P; Lees C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 40(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 22190416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.