These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20053046)
1. Learning from feedback: Spacing and the delay-retention effect. Smith TA; Kimball DR J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 20053046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Amount of postcue encoding predicts amount of directed forgetting. Pastötter B; Bäuml KH J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 20053044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier. Halamish V; Bjork RA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Metacognitive control and the spacing effect. Son LK J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):255-62. PubMed ID: 20053063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Better or worse than expected? Aging, learning, and the ERN. Eppinger B; Kray J; Mock B; Mecklinger A Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(2):521-39. PubMed ID: 17936313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect. Carpenter SK J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1547-52. PubMed ID: 21707217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fact learning: how information accuracy, delay, and repeated testing change retention and retrieval experience. Barber SJ; Rajaram S; Marsh EJ Memory; 2008 Nov; 16(8):934-46. PubMed ID: 18949663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests. Butler AC; Karpicke JD; Roediger HL J Exp Psychol Appl; 2007 Dec; 13(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 18194050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attempting to answer a meaningful question enhances subsequent learning even when feedback is delayed. Kornell N J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 23855547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ERP correlates of intentional forgetting. Mecklinger A; Parra M; Waldhauser GT Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():132-47. PubMed ID: 19103178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Testing and feedback effects on front-end control over later retrieval. Thomas RC; McDaniel MA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):437-50. PubMed ID: 22732026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using maintenance rehearsal to explore recognition memory. Humphreys MS; Maguire AM; McFarlane KA; Burt JS; Bolland SW; Murray KL; Dunn R J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):147-59. PubMed ID: 20053051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Self-regulated frequency of augmented information in skill learning. Patterson JT; Lee TD Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Mar; 64(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 20384416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pure mediated priming: a retrospective semantic matching model. Jones LL J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):135-46. PubMed ID: 20053050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Control of cost in prospective memory: evidence for spontaneous retrieval processes. Scullin MK; McDaniel MA; Einstein GO J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):190-203. PubMed ID: 20053054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relearning attenuates the benefits and costs of spacing. Rawson KA; Dunlosky J J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Nov; 142(4):1113-29. PubMed ID: 23088488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The list-strength effect in recall: relative-strength competition and retrieval inhibition may both contribute to forgetting. Verde MF J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):205-20. PubMed ID: 19210091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]