These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20053058)
21. Signal detection and threshold modeling of confidence-rating ROCs: A critical test with minimal assumptions. Kellen D; Klauer KC Psychol Rev; 2015 Jul; 122(3):542-57. PubMed ID: 26120910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Signal-detection, threshold, and dual-process models of recognition memory: ROCs and conscious recollection. Yonelinas AP; Dobbins I; Szymanski MD; Dhaliwal HS; King L Conscious Cogn; 1996 Dec; 5(4):418-41. PubMed ID: 9063609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Phantom ROC: Recollection rejection in a hybrid conjoint recognition signal detection model. Lampinen JM; Watkins KN; Odegard TN Memory; 2006 Aug; 14(6):655-71. PubMed ID: 16829485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity. Awh E; Barton B; Vogel EK Psychol Sci; 2007 Jul; 18(7):622-8. PubMed ID: 17614871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The variance reaction time model. Sikström S Cogn Psychol; 2004 Jun; 48(4):371-421. PubMed ID: 15099797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of familiarity level and repetition on recognition accuracy. Tussing AA; Greene RL Am J Psychol; 2001; 114(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 11258228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. ROCs in recognition with and without identification. Cleary AM Memory; 2005 Jul; 13(5):472-83. PubMed ID: 16020377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Superadditive memory strength for item and source recognition: the role of hierarchical relational binding in the medial temporal lobe. Shimamura AP; Wickens TD Psychol Rev; 2009 Jan; 116(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 19159146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Testing a neurocomputational model of recollection, familiarity, and source recognition. Elfman KW; Parks CM; Yonelinas AP J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jul; 34(4):752-68. PubMed ID: 18605866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Control of cost in prospective memory: evidence for spontaneous retrieval processes. Scullin MK; McDaniel MA; Einstein GO J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):190-203. PubMed ID: 20053054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Separating sensitivity from response bias: implications of comparisons of yes-no and forced-choice tests for models and measures of recognition memory. Kroll NE; Yonelinas AP; Dobbins IG; Frederick CM J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Jun; 131(2):241-54. PubMed ID: 12049242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Recognition ROCs are curvilinear-or are they? On premature arguments against the two-high-threshold model of recognition. Bröder A; Schütz J J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):587-606. PubMed ID: 19379038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. No special K! A signal detection framework for the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Higham PA J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Feb; 136(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 17324082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. ROC residuals in signal-detection models of recognition memory. Kellen D; Singmann H Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):253-64. PubMed ID: 26228182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Binary ROCs in perception and recognition memory are curved. Dube C; Rotello CM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):130-51. PubMed ID: 21859236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The distribution of subjective memory strength: list strength and response bias. Criss AH Cogn Psychol; 2009 Dec; 59(4):297-319. PubMed ID: 19765699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]