BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20053072)

  • 1. Visual search without attentional displacement.
    Zénon A; Ben Hamed S; Duhamel JR; Olivier E
    J Vis; 2009 Oct; 9(11):9.1-15. PubMed ID: 20053072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dual-state modulation of the contextual cueing effect: Evidence from eye movement recordings.
    Zhao G; Liu Q; Jiao J; Zhou P; Li H; Sun HJ
    J Vis; 2012 Jun; 12(6):11. PubMed ID: 22685338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
    Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Serial attention mechanisms in visual search: a direct behavioral demonstration.
    Bricolo E; Gianesini T; Fanini A; Bundesen C; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Oct; 14(7):980-93. PubMed ID: 12419123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hemispheric asymmetries in visual search.
    Poynter W; Roberts C
    Laterality; 2012; 17(6):711-26. PubMed ID: 23098199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual impairment at large eccentricity in participants treated by vigabatrin: visual, attentional or recognition deficit?
    Naili F; Boucart M; Derambure P; Arndt C
    Epilepsy Res; 2009 Dec; 87(2-3):213-22. PubMed ID: 19800764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A unified bayesian observer analysis for set size and cueing effects on perceptual decisions and saccades.
    Shimozaki SS; Schoonveld WA; Eckstein MP
    J Vis; 2012 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 22728676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Complex backgrounds delay low-load visual search.
    Vavassis A; Von Grünau MW
    Spat Vis; 2007; 20(5):467-88. PubMed ID: 17716528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attention mechanisms in visual search -- an fMRI study.
    Leonards U; Sunaert S; Van Hecke P; Orban GA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2000; 12 Suppl 2():61-75. PubMed ID: 11506648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Not all features are created equal: Processing asymmetries between location and object features.
    Chen Z
    Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1481-91. PubMed ID: 19303423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The speed of free will.
    Horowitz TS; Wolfe JM; Alvarez GA; Cohen MA; Kuzmova YI
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2262-88. PubMed ID: 19255946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A bottom-up model of spatial attention predicts human error patterns in rapid scene recognition.
    Einhäuser W; Mundhenk TN; Baldi P; Koch C; Itti L
    J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(10):6.1-13. PubMed ID: 17997675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learning by selection: visual search and object perception in young infants.
    Amso D; Johnson SP
    Dev Psychol; 2006 Nov; 42(6):1236-45. PubMed ID: 17087555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Learning in shifts of transient attention improves recognition of parts of ambiguous figure-ground displays.
    Kristjánsson A
    J Vis; 2009 Apr; 9(4):21.1-11. PubMed ID: 19757930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feature specificity in attentional capture by size and color.
    Harris AM; Remington RW; Becker SI
    J Vis; 2013 May; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23650630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A need for more information uptake but not focused attention to access basic-level representations.
    Poncet M; Reddy L; Fabre-Thorpe M
    J Vis; 2012 Jan; 12(1):15. PubMed ID: 22262913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The path of visual attention.
    Brown JM; Breitmeyer BG; Leighty KA; Denney HI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Feb; 121(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 16321354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Top-down dimensional weight set determines the capture of visual attention: evidence from the PCN component.
    Töllner T; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    Cereb Cortex; 2012 Jul; 22(7):1554-63. PubMed ID: 21903593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional guidance relies on a winner-take-all mechanism.
    Zénon A; Ben Hamed S; Duhamel JR; Olivier E
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(12):1522-31. PubMed ID: 19303424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.