These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20053072)

  • 41. Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes.
    Lamy D; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1003-20. PubMed ID: 14585019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Involuntary cueing effects on accuracy measures: Stimulus and task dependence.
    Kerzel D; Zarian L; Souto D
    J Vis; 2009 Oct; 9(11):16.1-16. PubMed ID: 20053079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Neural mechanisms of attentional shifts due to irrelevant spatial and numerical cues.
    Ranzini M; Dehaene S; Piazza M; Hubbard EM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2615-24. PubMed ID: 19465038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The neural basis of perceptual hypothesis generation and testing.
    Weidner R; Shah NJ; Fink GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 18(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 16494685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Object-based representations facilitate memory for inhibitory processes.
    Paul MA; Tipper SP
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Feb; 148(3):283-9. PubMed ID: 12541139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Object-based attention and visual area LO.
    de-Wit LH; Kentridge RW; Milner AD
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1483-90. PubMed ID: 19038274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Active listening impairs visual perception and selectivity: an ERP study of auditory dual-task costs on visual attention.
    Gherri E; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 23(4):832-44. PubMed ID: 20465407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Attentional spreading in object-based attention.
    Richard AM; Lee H; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):842-53. PubMed ID: 18665730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The course of visual searching to a target in a fixed location: electrophysiological evidence from an emotional flanker task.
    Dong G; Yang L; Shen Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Aug; 460(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 19446605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of memory load on visual search.
    Gil-Gómez de Liaño B; Botella J
    Psicothema; 2010 Nov; 22(4):725-31. PubMed ID: 21044505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Attentional effects on sensory tuning for single-feature detection and double-feature conjunction.
    Neri P
    Vision Res; 2004 Dec; 44(26):3053-64. PubMed ID: 15474578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception.
    Võ ML; Henderson JM
    J Vis; 2009 Mar; 9(3):24.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effects of instantaneous object input and past experience on object-based attention.
    Ho MC; Yeh SL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Sep; 132(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 19281963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Attentional selection of noncontiguous locations: the spotlight is only transiently "split".
    Dubois J; Hamker FH; VanRullen R
    J Vis; 2009 May; 9(5):3.1-11. PubMed ID: 19757881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Exogenous attentional selection of transparent superimposed surfaces modulates early event-related potentials.
    Khoe W; Mitchell JF; Reynolds JH; Hillyard SA
    Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(24):3004-14. PubMed ID: 16153678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Stimulus-driven mechanisms underlying visual search asymmetry revealed by classification image analyses.
    Saiki J
    J Vis; 2008 Apr; 8(4):30.1-19. PubMed ID: 18484869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Combining top-down processes to guide eye movements during real-world scene search.
    Malcolm GL; Henderson JM
    J Vis; 2010 Feb; 10(2):4.1-11. PubMed ID: 20462305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Altering attentional control settings causes persistent biases of visual attention.
    Knight HC; Smith DT; Knight DC; Ellison A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(1):129-49. PubMed ID: 25801329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Contingent capture is weakened in search for multiple features from different dimensions.
    Biderman D; Biderman N; Zivony A; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1974-1992. PubMed ID: 28425733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.