These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20053079)

  • 1. Involuntary cueing effects on accuracy measures: Stimulus and task dependence.
    Kerzel D; Zarian L; Souto D
    J Vis; 2009 Oct; 9(11):16.1-16. PubMed ID: 20053079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Involuntary attention with uncertainty: peripheral cues improve perception of masked letters, but may impair perception of low-contrast letters.
    Kerzel D; Gauch A; Buetti S
    J Vis; 2010 Oct; 10(12):12. PubMed ID: 21047744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Voluntary and involuntary attention have different consequences: the effect of perceptual difficulty.
    Prinzmetal W; Zvinyatskovskiy A; Gutierrez P; Dilem L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):352-69. PubMed ID: 18609402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bias-free double judgment accuracy during spatial attention cueing: performance enhancement from voluntary and involuntary attention.
    Pack W; Klein SA; Carney T
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():204-12. PubMed ID: 25159288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Large effects of peripheral cues on appearance correlate with low precision.
    Kerzel D; Zarian L; Gauch A; Buetti S
    J Vis; 2010 Sep; 10(11):26. PubMed ID: 20884521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Not all features are created equal: Processing asymmetries between location and object features.
    Chen Z
    Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1481-91. PubMed ID: 19303423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bias corrected double judgment accuracy during spatial attention cueing: unmasked stimuli with non-predictive and semi-predictive cues.
    Pack W; Klein SA; Carney T
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():213-25. PubMed ID: 25130410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
    Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A unified bayesian observer analysis for set size and cueing effects on perceptual decisions and saccades.
    Shimozaki SS; Schoonveld WA; Eckstein MP
    J Vis; 2012 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 22728676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of target and distractor heterogeneity on search for a color target.
    Nagy AL; Neriani KE; Young TL
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1885-99. PubMed ID: 15797778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture.
    Gronau N; Cohen A; Ben-Shakhar G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1685-95. PubMed ID: 19382007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of perceptual and motor decisions via confidence judgments and saccade curvature.
    Cardoso-Leite P; Gorea A
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Jun; 101(6):2822-36. PubMed ID: 19261707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The neural basis of perceptual hypothesis generation and testing.
    Weidner R; Shah NJ; Fink GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 18(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 16494685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Saccade target selection: Do distractors affect saccade accuracy?
    Findlay JM; Blythe HI
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1267-74. PubMed ID: 18691610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue-task transition congruency.
    Van Loy B; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1916-35. PubMed ID: 20574933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The attentional white bear phenomenon: the mandatory allocation of attention to expected distractor locations.
    Tsal Y; Makovski T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):351-63. PubMed ID: 16634675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attention orienting and the time course of perceptual decisions: response time distributions with masked and unmasked displays.
    Smith PL; Ratcliff R; Wolfgang BJ
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1297-320. PubMed ID: 15066392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Action-related objects influence the distribution of visuospatial attention.
    Roberts KL; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):669-88. PubMed ID: 21113857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial uncertainty explains exogenous and endogenous attentional cuing effects in visual signal detection.
    Gould IC; Wolfgang BJ; Smith PL
    J Vis; 2007 Oct; 7(13):4.1-17. PubMed ID: 17997632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attention delays perceived stimulus offset.
    Rolke B; Ulrich R; Bausenhart KM
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(18):2926-33. PubMed ID: 16647741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.