These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20053088)

  • 41. Gaze distribution analysis and saliency prediction across age groups.
    Krishna O; Helo A; Rämä P; Aizawa K
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0193149. PubMed ID: 29474378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Active inhibition and memory promote exploration and search of natural scenes.
    Bays PM; Husain M
    J Vis; 2012 Jan; 12(8):. PubMed ID: 22895881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Prolongation of latency of horizontal saccades in elderly is distance and task specific.
    Yang Q; Kapoula Z; Debay E; Coubard O; Orssaud C; Samson M
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(5):751-9. PubMed ID: 16236337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Visual memory for fixated regions of natural images dissociates attraction and recognition.
    van der Linde I; Rajashekar U; Bovik AC; Cormack LK
    Perception; 2009; 38(8):1152-71. PubMed ID: 19817149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The spatio-temporal tuning of the mechanisms in the control of saccadic eye movements.
    White BJ; Kerzel D; Gegenfurtner KR
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3886-97. PubMed ID: 16879855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Differential detection of global luminance and contrast changes across saccades and flickers during active scene perception.
    Henderson JM; Brockmole JR; Gajewski DA
    Vision Res; 2008 Jan; 48(1):16-29. PubMed ID: 18078976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A model of proto-object based saliency.
    Russell AF; Mihalaş S; von der Heydt R; Niebur E; Etienne-Cummings R
    Vision Res; 2014 Jan; 94():1-15. PubMed ID: 24184601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Apparent motion during saccadic suppression periods.
    Allison RS; Schumacher J; Sadr S; Herpers R
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 202(1):155-69. PubMed ID: 20024650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effect of previously fixated locations on saccade trajectory during free visual search.
    Sogo H; Takeda Y
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3831-44. PubMed ID: 16938331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. An equivalent noise investigation of saccadic suppression.
    Watson T; Krekelberg B
    J Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 31(17):6535-41. PubMed ID: 21525294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Presaccadic attention interferes with feature detection.
    Collins T; Heed T; Doré-Mazars K; Röder B
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Feb; 201(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 19760268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. What's color got to do with it? The influence of color on visual attention in different categories.
    Frey HP; Honey C; König P
    J Vis; 2008 Oct; 8(14):6.1-17. PubMed ID: 19146307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Optimal feature integration in visual search.
    Vincent BT; Baddeley RJ; Troscianko T; Gilchrist ID
    J Vis; 2009 May; 9(5):15.1-11. PubMed ID: 19757893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Low-level visual saliency does not predict change detection in natural scenes.
    Stirk JA; Underwood G
    J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(10):3.1-10. PubMed ID: 17997672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Saccade target selection: Do distractors affect saccade accuracy?
    Findlay JM; Blythe HI
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1267-74. PubMed ID: 18691610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Psychophysical evaluation of individual low-level feature influences on visual attention.
    Berga D; Fdez-Vidal XR; Otazu X; Leborán V; Pardo XM
    Vision Res; 2019 Jan; 154():60-79. PubMed ID: 30408434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Attentive pointing in natural scenes correlates with other measures of attention.
    Jeck DM; Qin M; Egeth H; Niebur E
    Vision Res; 2017 Jun; 135():54-64. PubMed ID: 28427890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. How does image noise affect actual and predicted human gaze allocation in assessing image quality?
    Röhrbein F; Goddard P; Schneider M; James G; Guo K
    Vision Res; 2015 Jul; 112():11-25. PubMed ID: 25982711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Viewing behavior and the impact of low-level image properties across repeated presentations of complex scenes.
    Kaspar K; König P
    J Vis; 2011 Nov; 11(13):26. PubMed ID: 22131447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Capture of the eyes by relevant and irrelevant onsets.
    Mulckhuyse M; van Zoest W; Theeuwes J
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Mar; 186(2):225-35. PubMed ID: 18057925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.