117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20053089)
1. Different cue weights at the same place.
Muller CM; Brenner E; Smeets JB
J Vis; 2009 Oct; 9(11):26.1-5. PubMed ID: 20053089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maybe they are all circles: clues and cues.
Muller CM; Brenner E; Smeets JB
J Vis; 2009 Aug; 9(9):10.1-5. PubMed ID: 19761343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neural correlates of monocular and binocular depth cues based on natural images: a LORETA analysis.
Fischmeister FP; Bauer H
Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(20):3373-80. PubMed ID: 16828836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Integrating visual cues for motor control: a matter of time.
Greenwald HS; Knill DC; Saunders JA
Vision Res; 2005 Jul; 45(15):1975-89. PubMed ID: 15820516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monocular occlusions determine the perceived shape and depth of occluding surfaces.
Tsirlin I; Wilcox LM; Allison RS
J Vis; 2010 Jun; 10(6):11. PubMed ID: 20884560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Slant cue are combined early in visual processing: evidence from visual search.
Sousa R; Brenner E; Smeets JB
Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):257-61. PubMed ID: 19027776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Slant perception, and its voluntary control, do not govern the slant aftereffect: multiple slant signals adapt independently.
Knapen T; van Ee R
Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(20):3381-92. PubMed ID: 16698056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monocular symmetry in binocular vision.
Erkelens CJ; van Ee R
J Vis; 2007 Mar; 7(4):5. PubMed ID: 17461689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Depth cue combination in spontaneous eye movements.
Wismeijer DA; Erkelens CJ; van Ee R; Wexler M
J Vis; 2010 Jun; 10(6):25. PubMed ID: 20884574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative perceived depth from sequential monocular decamouflage.
Brooks KR; Gillam BJ
Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(5):605-13. PubMed ID: 16054190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pictorial cues constrain depth in da Vinci stereopsis.
Makino Y; Yano M
Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):91-105. PubMed ID: 16271743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Seeing in 3-d with just one eye: stereopsis without binocular vision.
Vishwanath D; Hibbard PB
Psychol Sci; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1673-85. PubMed ID: 23892232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The accuracy of metric judgements: perception of surface normal.
Porrill J; Duke PA; Taroyan NA; Frisby JP; Buckley D
Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(12):1140-57. PubMed ID: 20298712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reweighting visual cues by touch.
van Beers RJ; van Mierlo CM; Smeets JB; Brenner E
J Vis; 2011 Sep; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 21954298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Slant cues are processed with different latencies for the online control of movement.
van Mierlo CM; Louw S; Smeets JB; Brenner E
J Vis; 2009 Mar; 9(3):25.1-8. PubMed ID: 19757964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contributions of binocular and monocular cues to motion-in-depth perception.
Thompson L; Ji M; Rokers B; Rosenberg A
J Vis; 2019 Mar; 19(3):2. PubMed ID: 30836382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Testing a counter-intuitive prediction of optimal cue combination.
Muller CM; Brenner E; Smeets JB
Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(1):134-9. PubMed ID: 18983869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Focus cues affect perceived depth.
Watt SJ; Akeley K; Ernst MO; Banks MS
J Vis; 2005 Dec; 5(10):834-62. PubMed ID: 16441189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dissociations between slant-contrast and reversed slant-contrast.
Poom L; Olsson H; Börjesson E
Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(6):746-54. PubMed ID: 17300825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Temporal dependencies in resolving monocular and binocular cue conflict in slant perception.
Allison RS; Howard IP
Vision Res; 2000; 40(14):1869-85. PubMed ID: 10837832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
