These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20053156)

  • 1. Users' perspectives on the benefits of FM systems with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Fournier P; Séguin C; Armstrong S; Chénier J; Schramm D
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jan; 49(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 20053156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of cochlear implants from the perspective of significant others of adult cochlear implant users.
    Kennedy V; Stephens D; Fitzmaurice P
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):607-14. PubMed ID: 18401287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech recognition and subjective perceptions of neck-loop FM receivers with cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC; Huynh C; Romine D; Jimenez R
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 22992447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Music perception of cochlear implant users: a questionnaire, and its implications for a music training program.
    Looi V; She J
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Feb; 49(2):116-28. PubMed ID: 20151886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluations of 3M/House single-channel and nucleus multichannel cochlear implants.
    Cunningham JK; Stoeckert JA
    Am J Otol; 1992 Sep; 13(5):449-53. PubMed ID: 1443081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parents' views on the quality of life of their children 2-3 years after cochlear implantation.
    Huttunen K; Rimmanen S; Vikman S; Virokannas N; Sorri M; Archbold S; Lutman ME
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 73(12):1786-94. PubMed ID: 19875180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality of life in hearing-impaired adults: the role of cochlear implants and hearing aids.
    Cohen SM; Labadie RF; Dietrich MS; Haynes DS
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Oct; 131(4):413-22. PubMed ID: 15467610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech perception by students with cochlear implants using sound-field systems in classrooms.
    Iglehart F
    Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 15248805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of music perception in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users and normal-hearing subjects.
    Veekmans K; Ressel L; Mueller J; Vischer M; Brockmeier SJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(5):315-26. PubMed ID: 19372650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors affecting choice of device by cochlear implant candidates.
    Migirov L; Taitelbaum-Swead R; Hildesheimer M; Wolf M; Kronenberg J
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):743-6. PubMed ID: 19638937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Solutions to electromagnetic interference problems between cochlear implants and GSM phones.
    Sorri MJ; Piiparinen PJ; Huttunen KH; Haho MJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2006 Mar; 14(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 16562637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of telemedicine in the remote programming of cochlear implants.
    Ramos A; Rodriguez C; Martinez-Beneyto P; Perez D; Gault A; Falcon JC; Boyle P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 May; 129(5):533-40. PubMed ID: 18649152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Musical perception and enjoyment in post-lingual patients with cochlear implants].
    Lassaletta L; Castro A; Bastarrica M; Pérez-Mora R; Herrán B; Sanz L; de Sarriá MJ; Gavilán J
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2008 May; 59(5):228-34. PubMed ID: 18501158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Advantages of disadvantages expected and reported by cochlear implant patients.
    Tyler RS
    Am J Otol; 1994 Jul; 15(4):523-31. PubMed ID: 8588608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of FM-receiver gain on speech-recognition performance of adults with cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC; Wolfe J; Lawless T; Stout B
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Apr; 48(4):196-203. PubMed ID: 19363720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beneficial auditory and cognitive effects of auditory brainstem implantation in children.
    Colletti L
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 127(9):943-6. PubMed ID: 17712673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.