123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20053389)
1. Features of graded category structure: Generalizing the family resemblance and polymorphous concept models.
Dry MJ; Storms G
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Mar; 133(3):244-55. PubMed ID: 20053389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast effects in typicality judgements: a hierarchical Bayesian approach.
Voorspoels W; Storms G; Vanpaemel W
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(9):1721-39. PubMed ID: 22537154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exemplar by feature applicability matrices and other Dutch normative data for semantic concepts.
De Deyne S; Verheyen S; Ameel E; Vanpaemel W; Dry MJ; Voorspoels W; Storms G
Behav Res Methods; 2008 Nov; 40(4):1030-48. PubMed ID: 19001394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of childhood hearing loss on organization of semantic memory: typicality and relatedness.
Jerger S; Damian MF; Tye-Murray N; Dougherty M; Mehta J; Spence M
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):686-702. PubMed ID: 17086079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What some effects might not be: the time to verify membership in "well-defined" categories.
Larochelle S; Richard S; Soulières I
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Nov; 53(4):929-61. PubMed ID: 11131822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting category intuitiveness with the rational model, the simplicity model, and the generalized context model.
Pothos EM; Bailey TM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1062-80. PubMed ID: 19586270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The generalized polymorphous concept account of graded structure in abstract categories.
Verheyen S; Stukken L; De Deyne S; Dry MJ; Storms G
Mem Cognit; 2011 Aug; 39(6):1117-32. PubMed ID: 21472478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Category and feature identification.
Kemp C; Chang KM; Lombardi L
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Mar; 133(3):216-33. PubMed ID: 20080224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Category structure and semantic priming in retarded adolescents.
Weil CM; McCauley C; Sperber RD
Am J Ment Defic; 1978 Sep; 83(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 696758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conceptual structure and the structure of concepts: a distributed account of category-specific deficits.
Tyler LK; Moss HE; Durrant-Peatfield MR; Levy JP
Brain Lang; 2000 Nov; 75(2):195-231. PubMed ID: 11049666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prototypes in category learning: the effects of category size, category structure, and stimulus complexity.
Minda JP; Smith JD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):775-99. PubMed ID: 11394680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finding the features that represent stimuli.
Zeigenfuse MD; Lee MD
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Mar; 133(3):283-95. PubMed ID: 19748070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distinguishing prototype-based and exemplar-based processes in dot-pattern category learning.
Smith JD; Minda JP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):800-11. PubMed ID: 12109770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combining feature norms and text data with topic models.
Steyvers M
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Mar; 133(3):234-43. PubMed ID: 19948335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modeling a flexible representation machinery of human concept learning.
Matsuka T; Sakamoto Y; Chouchourelou A
Neural Netw; 2008; 21(2-3):289-302. PubMed ID: 18243653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison processes in category learning: from theory to behavior.
Hammer R; Bar-Hillel A; Hertz T; Weinshall D; Hochstein S
Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1225():102-18. PubMed ID: 18614160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Similar but not the same: a comparison of the utility of directly rated and feature-based similarity measures for generating spatial models of conceptual data.
Dry MJ; Storms G
Behav Res Methods; 2009 Aug; 41(3):889-900. PubMed ID: 19587206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Category-specific effects in semantic memory: category-task interactions suggested by fMRI.
Grossman M; Koenig P; Kounios J; McMillan C; Work M; Moore P
Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):1003-9. PubMed ID: 16413792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exemplar and prototype models revisited: response strategies, selective attention, and stimulus generalization.
Nosofsky RM; Zaki SR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):924-40. PubMed ID: 12219799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Category representation for classification and feature inference.
Johansen MK; Kruschke JK
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1433-58. PubMed ID: 16393056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
