These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20053389)
41. Similarity, feature discovery, and the size principle. Navarro DJ; Perfors AF Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Mar; 133(3):256-68. PubMed ID: 19959157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Generalizing norms and preferences within social categories and individuals. Kalish CW Dev Psychol; 2012 Jul; 48(4):1133-43. PubMed ID: 22103303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Prototypicality, distinctiveness, and intercorrelation: Analyses of the semantic attributes of living and nonliving concepts. Garrard P; Ralph MA; Hodges JR; Patterson K Cogn Neuropsychol; 2001 Mar; 18(2):125-74. PubMed ID: 20945209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Ideals and category typicality. Kim S; Murphy GL J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1092-112. PubMed ID: 21767059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Premise typicality as feature inference decision-making in perceptual categories. Morgan EL; Johansen MK Mem Cognit; 2022 May; 50(4):817-836. PubMed ID: 34623605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Dissimilarity is used as evidence of category membership in multidimensional perceptual categorization: a test of the similarity-dissimilarity generalized context model. Stewart N; Morin C Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Oct; 60(10):1337-46. PubMed ID: 17853242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Typicality in logically defined categories: exemplar-similarity versus rule instantiation. Nosofsky RM Mem Cognit; 1991 Mar; 19(2):131-50. PubMed ID: 2017037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The roles of typicality, instance dominance, and category dominance in verifying category membership. Chumbley JI J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1986 Apr; 12(2):257-67. PubMed ID: 2939182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Essentialism and graded membership in animal and artifact categories. Kalish CW Mem Cognit; 1995 May; 23(3):335-53. PubMed ID: 7791602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Exemplars and prototypes in natural language concepts: a typicality-based evaluation. Voorspoels W; Vanpaemel W; Storms G Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Jun; 15(3):630-7. PubMed ID: 18567266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Abstraction and model evaluation in category learning. Vanpaemel W; Storms G Behav Res Methods; 2010 May; 42(2):421-37. PubMed ID: 20479173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Category dimensionality and feature knowledge: when more features are learned as easily as fewer. Hoffman AB; Murphy GL J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):301-315. PubMed ID: 16569148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. Barsalou LW J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1985 Oct; 11(4):629-54. PubMed ID: 2932520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Learning categories by making predictions: an investigation of indirect category learning. Minda JP; Ross BH Mem Cognit; 2004 Dec; 32(8):1355-68. PubMed ID: 15900929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The contribution of category relationships to similarity ratings. Dopkins S; Ngo CT Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Sep; 55(3):244-52. PubMed ID: 11605559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The concept of dimensions in developmental research. Offenbach SI; Blumberg FC Adv Child Dev Behav; 1985; 19():83-112. PubMed ID: 3911755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The effect of training methodology on knowledge representation in categorization. Hélie S; Shamloo F; Ell SW PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0183904. PubMed ID: 28846732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]