BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20053645)

  • 1. Microscale laser surgery reveals adaptive function of male intromittent genitalia.
    Polak M; Rashed A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 May; 277(1686):1371-6. PubMed ID: 20053645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual and synergistic effects of male external genital traits in sexual selection.
    Rodriguez-Exposito E; Garcia-Gonzalez F; Polak M
    J Evol Biol; 2020 Jan; 33(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 31554023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Twin intromittent organs of Drosophila for traumatic insemination.
    Kamimura Y
    Biol Lett; 2007 Aug; 3(4):401-4. PubMed ID: 17519186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the post-copulatory sexual selection hypothesis for genital evolution reveals evidence for pleiotropic harm exerted by the male genital spines of Drosophila ananassae.
    Grieshop K; Polak M
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Dec; 27(12):2676-86. PubMed ID: 25403358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The precopulatory function of male genital spines in Drosophila ananassae[Doleschall] (Diptera: Drosophilidae) revealed by laser surgery.
    Grieshop K; Polak M
    Evolution; 2012 Aug; 66(8):2637-45. PubMed ID: 22834760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does surgical manipulation of Drosophila intromittent organs affect insemination success?
    Kamimura Y; Polak M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2011 Mar; 278(1707):815-6. PubMed ID: 21147802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Drosophila pachea asymmetric lobes are part of a grasping device and stabilize one-sided mating.
    Rhebergen FT; Courtier-Orgogozo V; Dumont J; Schilthuizen M; Lang M
    BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Sep; 16(1):176. PubMed ID: 27586247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Significance of constraints on genital coevolution: Why do female Drosophila appear to cooperate with males by accepting harmful matings?
    Kamimura Y
    Evolution; 2016 Jul; 70(7):1674-83. PubMed ID: 27174423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How the length of genital parts affects copulation performance in a carabid beetle: implications for correlated genital evolution between the sexes.
    Okuzaki Y; Sota T
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Mar; 27(3):565-74. PubMed ID: 24471576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exaggerated male genitalia intensify interspecific reproductive interference by damaging heterospecific female genitalia.
    Kyogoku D; Sota T
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Jun; 28(6):1283-9. PubMed ID: 25882439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental reduction of intromittent organ length reduces male reproductive success in a bug.
    Dougherty LR; Rahman IA; Burdfield-Steel ER; Greenway EV; Shuker DM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Jun; 282(1808):20150724. PubMed ID: 25972470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. No evidence for external genital morphology affecting cryptic female choice and reproductive isolation in Drosophila.
    LeVasseur-Viens H; Polak M; Moehring AJ
    Evolution; 2015 Jul; 69(7):1797-807. PubMed ID: 25962316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microsurgical manipulation reveals pre-copulatory function of key genital sclerites.
    Cocks OTM; Eady PE
    J Exp Biol; 2018 Apr; 221(Pt 8):. PubMed ID: 29559546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phenotypic engineering unveils the function of genital morphology.
    Hotzy C; Polak M; Rönn JL; Arnqvist G
    Curr Biol; 2012 Dec; 22(23):2258-61. PubMed ID: 23103188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Live for the moment--Adaptations in the male genital system of a sexually cannibalistic spider (Theridiidae, Araneae).
    Michalik P; Knoflach B; Thaler K; Alberti G
    Tissue Cell; 2010 Feb; 42(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 19643451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A non-sperm transferring genital trait under sexual selection: an experimental approach.
    Nessler SH; Uhl G; Schneider JM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Sep; 274(1623):2337-41. PubMed ID: 17644504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The evolution of female-biased genital diversity in bedbugs (Cimicidae).
    Roth S; Siva-Jothy MT; Balvín O; Morrow EH; Willassen E; Reinhardt K
    Evolution; 2024 Feb; 78(2):329-341. PubMed ID: 38006287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Condition dependence of male and female genital structures in the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae).
    Cayetano L; Bonduriansky R
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Jul; 28(7):1364-72. PubMed ID: 26077617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A time-sequence functional analysis of mating behaviour and genital coupling in Drosophila: role of cryptic female choice and male sex-drive in the evolution of male genitalia.
    Jagadeeshan S; Singh RS
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Jul; 19(4):1058-70. PubMed ID: 16780507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Male genital lobe morphology affects the chance to copulate in Drosophila pachea.
    Lefèvre BM; Catté D; Courtier-Orgogozo V; Lang M
    BMC Ecol Evol; 2021 Feb; 21(1):23. PubMed ID: 33573597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.