These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20054365)

  • 1. Shorter NIH grant form launches.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2010 Jan; 463(7277):12-3. PubMed ID: 20054365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. NIH: grants revamp needs grounding in evidence.
    Hannun YA
    Nature; 2008 Apr; 452(7189):811. PubMed ID: 18421328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Revamp for NIH grants.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2008 Feb; 451(7182):1035. PubMed ID: 18305502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. NIH responds to critics on peer review.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7197):835. PubMed ID: 18548033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extra scrutiny for 'grandee grantees'.
    Hand E
    Nature; 2012 Feb; 482(7386):450-1. PubMed ID: 22358805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer review reviewed.
    Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7159):115. PubMed ID: 17851475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New rules propose greater scrutiny for NIH grant recipients.
    Dove A
    Nat Med; 2006 Jan; 12(1):5. PubMed ID: 16397535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Science policy: Well-funded investigators should receive extra scrutiny.
    Berg JM
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):203. PubMed ID: 22972279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 222 NIH grants: 22 researchers.
    Hand E
    Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7185):258-9. PubMed ID: 18354436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. NIH: researchers lose out to war, not to each other.
    Vermund SH
    Nature; 2008 Apr; 452(7189):811. PubMed ID: 18421327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. NIH: Drop re-review for big grant holders.
    Roy HK
    Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7419):176. PubMed ID: 23060177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Italy outsources peer review to NIH.
    Van Noorden R
    Nature; 2009 Jun; 459(7249):900. PubMed ID: 19536229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. NIH firm on grant application rules.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2011 Mar; 471(7340):558. PubMed ID: 21455147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Research grants: Conform and be funded.
    Nicholson JM; Ioannidis JP
    Nature; 2012 Dec; 492(7427):34-6. PubMed ID: 23222591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. NIH pilots faster feedback for grant resubmissions.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1997 Oct; 389(6654):898. PubMed ID: 9353109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Racial bias continues to haunt NIH grants.
    Check Hayden E
    Nature; 2015 Nov; 527(7578):286-7. PubMed ID: 26581270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding the NIH review process: a brief guide to writing grant proposals in neurotoxicology.
    Audesirk G; Burbacher T; Guilarte TR; Laughlin NK; Lopachin R; Suszkiw J; Tilson H
    Neurotoxicology; 1999 Feb; 20(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 10091862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer review at NIH.
    Osthus RC
    Physiologist; 2007 Oct; 50(5):185, 187. PubMed ID: 17990627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gender bias goes away when grant reviewers focus on the science.
    Guglielmi G
    Nature; 2018 Feb; 554(7690):14-15. PubMed ID: 29388971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. NIH funds support more than a researcher's own lab.
    Varmus H
    Nature; 2008 Apr; 452(7189):811. PubMed ID: 18421329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.