These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. New rules propose greater scrutiny for NIH grant recipients. Dove A Nat Med; 2006 Jan; 12(1):5. PubMed ID: 16397535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Science policy: Well-funded investigators should receive extra scrutiny. Berg JM Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):203. PubMed ID: 22972279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. 222 NIH grants: 22 researchers. Hand E Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7185):258-9. PubMed ID: 18354436 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. NIH: researchers lose out to war, not to each other. Vermund SH Nature; 2008 Apr; 452(7189):811. PubMed ID: 18421327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. NIH: Drop re-review for big grant holders. Roy HK Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7419):176. PubMed ID: 23060177 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Italy outsources peer review to NIH. Van Noorden R Nature; 2009 Jun; 459(7249):900. PubMed ID: 19536229 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. NIH firm on grant application rules. Wadman M Nature; 2011 Mar; 471(7340):558. PubMed ID: 21455147 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Research grants: Conform and be funded. Nicholson JM; Ioannidis JP Nature; 2012 Dec; 492(7427):34-6. PubMed ID: 23222591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. NIH pilots faster feedback for grant resubmissions. Wadman M Nature; 1997 Oct; 389(6654):898. PubMed ID: 9353109 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Gender bias goes away when grant reviewers focus on the science. Guglielmi G Nature; 2018 Feb; 554(7690):14-15. PubMed ID: 29388971 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. NIH funds support more than a researcher's own lab. Varmus H Nature; 2008 Apr; 452(7189):811. PubMed ID: 18421329 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]