548 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20055893)
1. A vision for the European journal of clinical investigation: note from the new editors.
Ioannidis JP; Tatsioni A; Karassa FB
Eur J Clin Invest; 2010 Jan; 40(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20055893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors.
Newton DP
Account Res; 2010 May; 17(3):130-45. PubMed ID: 20461569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Scientific reporting guidelines].
Nylenna M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Conflict of interest. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
Ann Intern Med; 1993 Apr; 118(8):646-7. PubMed ID: 8452334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of editors, reviewers and authors in improving the journal quality.
Bugiardini R
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2011 Jan; 12(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21263233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative].
Werkö L
Lakartidningen; 2006 Oct 25-31; 103(43):3288-91. PubMed ID: 17117661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A common standard for conflict of interest disclosure in addiction journals.
Goozner M; Caplan A; Moreno J; Kramer BS; Babor TF; Husser WC
Addiction; 2009 Nov; 104(11):1779-84. PubMed ID: 19832777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Authorship and co-authorship].
Haug C
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Feb; 126(4):429. PubMed ID: 16477275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals.
Anraku A; Jin YP; Trope GE; Buys YM
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1093-6. PubMed ID: 19376583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Beautification and fraud.
Nat Cell Biol; 2006 Feb; 8(2):101-2. PubMed ID: 16450003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Peer review and the nursing literature.
Dougherty MC
Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):73. PubMed ID: 19289927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. When a journal cannot stand behind a published paper.
Guidotti TL
Arch Environ Occup Health; 2005; 60(3):115-7. PubMed ID: 17153083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Editors' note: New Board of International Consulting Editors (BICE).
Shader RI; Greenblatt DJ
J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2013 Feb; 33(1):44. PubMed ID: 23288228
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Your paper has been accepted for publication.
Munk-Jørgensen P; Christiansen B; Licht RW
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2010 Jan; 121(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20059451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Journals lack explicit policies for separating eds from ads.
Giles J
Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7033):549. PubMed ID: 15800585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [How strict should editors be? Nothing is done for the sake of errors].
Eklund J
Lakartidningen; 2004 Dec; 101(51-52):4250. PubMed ID: 15658596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry editorial policies and ethical guidelines.
Roth KA
J Histochem Cytochem; 2006 Feb; 54(2):129-30. PubMed ID: 16418501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals.
Baggs JG; Broome ME; Dougherty MC; Freda MC; Kearney MH
J Adv Nurs; 2008 Oct; 64(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 18764847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fortifying the external peer review: an editorial perspective.
Sohail S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Jan; 25(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 25604359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical research and the news media.
Campion EW
N Engl J Med; 2004 Dec; 351(23):2436-7. PubMed ID: 15575061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
