300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20056205)
1. Fate of cryopreserved donor embryos.
Knopman JM; Talebian S; Berkeley AS; Grifo JA; Noyes N; Licciardi F
Fertil Steril; 2010 Oct; 94(5):1689-92. PubMed ID: 20056205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony.
Shapiro BS; Daneshmand ST; Garner FC; Aguirre M; Ross R
Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17224151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes in anonymous shared versus exclusive donor oocyte in vitro fertilization cycles.
Mullin CM; Fino ME; Talebian S; Keegan D; Grifo JA; Licciardi F
Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):574-8. PubMed ID: 19815192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does storage time influence postthaw survival and pregnancy outcome? An analysis of 11,768 cryopreserved human embryos.
Riggs R; Mayer J; Dowling-Lacey D; Chi TF; Jones E; Oehninger S
Fertil Steril; 2010 Jan; 93(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 19027110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of fresh-cycle variables on the implantation potential of cryopreserved-thawed human embryos.
Urman B; Balaban B; Yakin K
Fertil Steril; 2007 Feb; 87(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 17097088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology].
Wang W; Yan ZJ; Cai LB; Chai DC; Liu CZ; Mao YD; Liu JY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 88(39):2755-8. PubMed ID: 19080449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis.
Oktay K; Cil AP; Bang H
Fertil Steril; 2006 Jul; 86(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 16818031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transfer and uterine factors are the major recipient-related determinants of success with donor eggs.
Zenke U; Chetkowski RJ
Fertil Steril; 2004 Oct; 82(4):850-6. PubMed ID: 15482759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cryopreservation of supernumerary high quality embryos predicts favorable outcomes for patients undergoing repeated cycles of in vitro fertilization.
Wang JG; Douglas NC; Dicken C; Nakhuda GS; Guarnaccia MM; Sauer MV
Fertil Steril; 2008 Feb; 89(2):368-74. PubMed ID: 17509594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of 2,386 consecutive cycles of in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection using autologous oocytes in women aged 40 years and above.
Serour G; Mansour R; Serour A; Aboulghar M; Amin Y; Kamal O; Al-Inany H; Aboulghar M
Fertil Steril; 2010 Oct; 94(5):1707-12. PubMed ID: 19896654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Delivery rate using cryopreserved oocytes is comparable to conventional in vitro fertilization using fresh oocytes: potential fertility preservation for female cancer patients.
Grifo JA; Noyes N
Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):391-6. PubMed ID: 19439285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single-blastocyst transfer decreases twin gestation without affecting pregnancy outcome.
Styer AK; Wright DL; Wolkovich AM; Veiga C; Toth TL
Fertil Steril; 2008 Jun; 89(6):1702-8. PubMed ID: 17644095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can cumulative pregnancy rates be increased by freezing and thawing single embryos?
Prades M; Golmard JL; Vauthier D; Lefèbvre G; Poirot C
Fertil Steril; 2009 Feb; 91(2):395-400. PubMed ID: 18295209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transfer of two versus three embryos in women less than 40 years old undergoing frozen transfer cycles.
Berin I; Engmann LL; Benadiva CA; Schmidt DW; Nulsen JC; Maier DB
Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):355-9. PubMed ID: 19324343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013.
Crawford S; Boulet SL; Kawwass JF; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM
Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27842997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multicenter observational study on slow-cooling oocyte cryopreservation: clinical outcome.
Borini A; Levi Setti PE; Anserini P; De Luca R; De Santis L; Porcu E; La Sala GB; Ferraretti A; Bartolotti T; Coticchio G; Scaravelli G
Fertil Steril; 2010 Oct; 94(5):1662-8. PubMed ID: 20047739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Difference in birth weight of consecutive sibling singletons is not found in oocyte donation when comparing fresh versus frozen embryo replacements.
Galliano D; Garrido N; Serra-Serra V; Pellicer A
Fertil Steril; 2015 Dec; 104(6):1411-8.e1-3. PubMed ID: 26363384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Slightly lower incidence of ectopic pregnancies in frozen embryo transfer cycles versus fresh in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective cohort study.
Decleer W; Osmanagaoglu K; Meganck G; Devroey P
Fertil Steril; 2014 Jan; 101(1):162-5. PubMed ID: 24238273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes in elective single blastocyst transfer versus double blastocyst transfer stratified by age.
Mullin CM; Fino ME; Talebian S; Krey LC; Licciardi F; Grifo JA
Fertil Steril; 2010 Apr; 93(6):1837-43. PubMed ID: 19249756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cryopreserved embryo transfers suggest that endometrial receptivity may contribute to reduced success rates of later developing embryos.
Richter KS; Shipley SK; McVearry I; Tucker MJ; Widra EA
Fertil Steril; 2006 Oct; 86(4):862-6. PubMed ID: 16935284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
