These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20056384)

  • 1. A nonparametric two-sample comparison for skewed data with unequal variances.
    Skovlund E
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Jun; 63(6):594-5. PubMed ID: 20056384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A nonparametric two-sample comparison for skewed data with unequal variances.
    Neuhäuser M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Jun; 63(6):691-3. PubMed ID: 20056388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonparametric comparison for panel count data with unequal observation processes.
    Zhao X; Sun J
    Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):770-9. PubMed ID: 21114659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sample size calculation for the van Elteren test adjusting for ties.
    Zhao YD; Rahardja D; Mei Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(6):1112-9. PubMed ID: 18991111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A simple procedure to compute the sample size needed to compare two independent groups when the population variances are unequal.
    Singer J
    Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(7):1089-95. PubMed ID: 11276038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On comparing two skewed distributions with unequal variances.
    Fagerland MW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):453-4; author reply 454-5. PubMed ID: 21050715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistics review 9: one-way analysis of variance.
    Bewick V; Cheek L; Ball J
    Crit Care; 2004 Apr; 8(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 15025774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sample size determination based on rank tests in clinical trials.
    Wang H; Chen B; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Nov; 13(4):735-51. PubMed ID: 14584719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the statistical power for multiple tests: a case study.
    Yeo A; Qu Y
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 18381588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of tests for restricted orderings in the three-class case.
    Alonzo TA; Nakas CT; Yiannoutsos CT; Bucher S
    Stat Med; 2009 Mar; 28(7):1144-58. PubMed ID: 19156672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample size redetermination for repeated measures studies.
    Julious S
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):284; author reply 284-5. PubMed ID: 15032802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On sample size calculation for 2x2 fixed-effect ANOVA when variances are unknown and possibly unequal.
    Guo JH; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):417-25. PubMed ID: 18559139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The analysis of small-sample multivariate data with applications in clinical trials.
    Mercante DE; Johnson WD
    J Biopharm Stat; 1993 Sep; 3(2):141-52. PubMed ID: 8220399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sample size computation for two-sample noninferiority log-rank test.
    Jung SH; Kang SJ; McCall LM; Blumenstein B
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):969-79. PubMed ID: 16279355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sample size re-estimation in group-sequential response-adaptive clinical trials.
    Morgan CC
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3843-57. PubMed ID: 14673942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sample size calculation for the Power Model for dose proportionality studies.
    Sethuraman VS; Leonov S; Squassante L; Mitchell TR; Hale MD
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 17323313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data.
    Vickers AJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Nov; 5():35. PubMed ID: 16269081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The appropriateness of the Wilcoxon test in ordinal data.
    Hilton JF
    Stat Med; 1996 Mar; 15(6):631-45. PubMed ID: 8731005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Approximate sample size formulas for the two-sample trimmed mean test with unequal variances.
    Luh WM; Guo JH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):137-46. PubMed ID: 17535584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimize the use of minimization with unequal allocation.
    Proschan M; Brittain E; Kammerman L
    Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):1135-41. PubMed ID: 21281276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.