These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20056665)

  • 1. Who evaluates public health programmes? A review of the NHS Breast Screening Programme.
    Jørgensen KJ; Gøtzsche PC
    J R Soc Med; 2010 Jan; 103(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 20056665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammography screening is harmful and should be abandoned.
    Gøtzsche PC
    J R Soc Med; 2015 Sep; 108(9):341-5. PubMed ID: 26359135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mammography screening is not as good as we hoped.
    Jørgensen KJ
    Maturitas; 2010 Jan; 65(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 19939593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recommending mammography screening beyond 80 years of age: a time for caution.
    Ciatto S
    Womens Health (Lond); 2008 Jul; 4(4):333-5. PubMed ID: 19072499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The NHS breast cancer screening programme.
    Day NE
    Br J Cancer; 2003 Jul; 89(1):1. PubMed ID: 12838291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening mammography.
    McRae S
    Can J Rural Med; 2010; 15(4):167; author reply 168. PubMed ID: 20875318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early detection of breast cancer the second time around: mammography in women with a personal history of breast cancer.
    Houssami N; Miglioretti DL
    Med J Aust; 2011 May; 194(9):439-40. PubMed ID: 21534896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The overdiagnosis nightmare: a time for caution.
    Ciatto S
    BMC Womens Health; 2009 Dec; 9():34. PubMed ID: 20015373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving screening recall services for women with false-positive mammograms: a comparison of qualitative evidence with UK guidelines.
    Bond M; Garside R; Hyde C
    BMJ Open; 2015 Jan; 5(1):e005855. PubMed ID: 25618139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Mammography and cervical cancer screening--a systematic review about women's knowledge, attitudes and participation in Germany].
    Dreier M; Borutta B; Töppich J; Bitzer EM; Walter U
    Gesundheitswesen; 2012 Nov; 74(11):722-35. PubMed ID: 22012563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of mammography in a public university affiliated hospital in an urban community.
    Hazany S; Khalkhali I
    Breast J; 2009; 15(3):318-20. PubMed ID: 19645796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time trends of process and impact indicators in Italian mammography screening programmes--1996-2004.
    Giordano L; Giorgi D; Piccini P; Ventura L; Stefanini V; Senore C; Paci E; Segnan N
    Epidemiol Prev; 2007; 31(2-3 Suppl 2):21-32. PubMed ID: 17824360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Invitation or summons? UK debate surrounds messages about mammography.
    Savage L
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Jul; 101(13):912-3. PubMed ID: 19549956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coming together to conquer the fight against breast cancer in countries of limited resources: the challenges and the opportunities.
    Masood S
    Breast J; 2007; 13(3):223-5. PubMed ID: 17461894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Economic evaluation of the new national breast cancer screening programme in France: application to the Bouche-du-Rhone district].
    Giorgi R; Reynaud J; Wait S; Seradour B
    Bull Cancer; 2005 Nov; 92(11):995-1001. PubMed ID: 16316834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Planning for quality in the NHS breast screening programme.
    Gray JA
    Qual Health Care; 1992 Jun; 1(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 10136841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Women who are recalled for further investigation for breast screening: psychological consequences 3 years after recall and factors affecting re-attendance.
    Brett J; Austoker J
    J Public Health Med; 2001 Dec; 23(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 11873891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monitoring and evaluating the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme: evaluating the variation in radiological performance between individual programmes using PPV-referral diagrams.
    Blanks RG; Moss SM; Wallis MG
    J Med Screen; 2001; 8(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 11373846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of breast cancer early detection in arab women in Israel--room for improvement.
    Keinan-Boker L
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2006 Jun; 15(5):542-5. PubMed ID: 16796481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Overdiagnosis in organised mammography screening in Denmark. A comparative study.
    Jørgensen KJ; Zahl PH; Gøtzsche PC
    BMC Womens Health; 2009 Dec; 9():36. PubMed ID: 20028513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.