BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20057011)

  • 1. A sector-integration method for dose/MU calculation in a uniform scanning proton beam.
    Zhao Q; Wu H; Wolanski M; Pack D; Johnstone PA; Das IJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(3):N87-95. PubMed ID: 20057011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monte Carlo investigation of collimator scatter of proton-therapy beams produced using the passive scattering method.
    Titt U; Zheng Y; Vassiliev ON; Newhauser WD
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):487-504. PubMed ID: 18185001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.
    Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A procedure for calculation of monitor units for passively scattered proton radiotherapy beams.
    Sahoo N; Zhu XR; Arjomandy B; Ciangaru G; Lii M; Amos R; Wu R; Gillin MT
    Med Phys; 2008 Nov; 35(11):5088-97. PubMed ID: 19070243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel method for patient exit and entrance dose prediction based on water equivalent path length measured with an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device.
    Kavuma A; Glegg M; Metwaly M; Currie G; Elliott A
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jan; 55(2):435-52. PubMed ID: 20019398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A particle track-repeating algorithm for proton beam dose calculation.
    Li JS; Shahine B; Fourkal E; Ma CM
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):1001-10. PubMed ID: 15798272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement of neutron dose equivalent and its dependence on beam configuration for a passive scattering proton delivery system.
    Wang X; Sahoo N; Zhu RX; Zullo JR; Gillin MT
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Apr; 76(5):1563-70. PubMed ID: 20097484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incorporating partial shining effects in proton pencil-beam dose calculation.
    Li Y; Zhang X; Lii M; Sahoo N; Zhu RX; Gillin M; Mohan R
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(3):605-16. PubMed ID: 18199905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incorporation of the aperture thickness in proton pencil-beam dose calculations.
    Slopsema RL; Kooy HM
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5441-53. PubMed ID: 17047262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Elements of commissioning step-and-shoot IMRT: delivery equipment and planning system issues posed by small segment dimensions and small monitor units.
    Aspradakis MM; Lambert GD; Steele A
    Med Dosim; 2005; 30(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 16275566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between the lateral penumbra of a collimated double-scattered beam and uncollimated scanning beam in proton radiotherapy.
    Safai S; Bortfeld T; Engelsman M
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(6):1729-50. PubMed ID: 18367800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monte Carlo simulations for configuring and testing an analytical proton dose-calculation algorithm.
    Newhauser W; Fontenot J; Zheng Y; Polf J; Titt U; Koch N; Zhang X; Mohan R
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(15):4569-84. PubMed ID: 17634651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of beam model differences in the comparison of dose calculation algorithms for lung cancer treatment planning.
    Chetty IJ; Rosu M; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):801-15. PubMed ID: 15798256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proton dose calculation based on in-air fluence measurements.
    Schaffner B
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(6):1545-62. PubMed ID: 18367787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of output factor, range, and spread-out bragg peak for proton therapy.
    Kim DW; Lim YK; Ahn SH; Shin J; Shin D; Yoon M; Lee SB; Kim DY; Park SY
    Med Dosim; 2011; 36(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 20599372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Commissioning stereotactic radiosurgery beams using both experimental and theoretical methods.
    Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2549-66. PubMed ID: 16675869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
    Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dose monitoring and output correction for the effects of scanning field changes with uniform scanning proton beam.
    Zhao Q; Wu H; Cheng CW; Das IJ
    Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4655-61. PubMed ID: 21928638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A beam source model for scanned proton beams.
    Kimstrand P; Traneus E; Ahnesjö A; Grusell E; Glimelius B; Tilly N
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3151-68. PubMed ID: 17505095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modelling lateral beam quality variations in pencil kernel based photon dose calculations.
    Nyholm T; Olofsson J; Ahnesjö A; Karlsson M
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 51(16):4111-8. PubMed ID: 16885628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.