305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20058569)
1. Comparison between preloading with 10 ml/kg and 20 ml/kg of Ringer's lactate in preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.
Muzlifah KB; Choy YC
Med J Malaysia; 2009 Jun; 64(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 20058569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hydroxyethylstarch 10% is superior to Ringer's solution for preloading before spinal anesthesia for Cesarean section.
Siddik SM; Aouad MT; Kai GE; Sfeir MM; Baraka AS
Can J Anaesth; 2000 Jul; 47(7):616-21. PubMed ID: 10930199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is ephedrine infusion more effective at preventing hypotension than traditional prehydration during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section in African parturients?
Desalu I; Kushimo OT
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2005 Oct; 14(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 16154346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of intravenous ephedrine with phenylephrine for the maintenance of arterial blood pressure during elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia.
Adigun TA; Amanor-Boadu SD; Soyannwo OA
Afr J Med Med Sci; 2010 Mar; 39(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 20632667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Different preloading protocols with constant ephedrine infusion in the prevention of hypotension for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.
Faydaci F; Gunaydin B
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2011; 62(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 21612139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 6% Hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4) vs Ringer's lactate preloading before spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery: the randomized, double-blind, multicentre CAESAR trial.
Mercier FJ; Diemunsch P; Ducloy-Bouthors AS; Mignon A; Fischler M; Malinovsky JM; Bolandard F; Aya AG; Raucoules-Aimé M; Chassard D; Keita H; Rigouzzo A; Le Gouez A;
Br J Anaesth; 2014 Sep; 113(3):459-67. PubMed ID: 24970272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined use of crystalloid preload and low dose spinal anesthesia for preventing hypotension in spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
Ouerghi S; Bougacha MA; Frikha N; Mestiri T; Ben Ammar MS; Mebazaa MS
Middle East J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jun; 20(5):667-72. PubMed ID: 20803854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fluid preload before spinal anaesthesia in Caesarean section: the effect on neonatal acid-base status.
Chanimov M; Gershfeld S; Cohen ML; Sherman D; Bahar M
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2006 Aug; 23(8):676-9. PubMed ID: 16438767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prevention of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (Voluven) versus lactated Ringer's solution.
Madi-Jebara S; Ghosn A; Sleilaty G; Richa F; Cherfane A; Haddad F; Yazigi A; Antakly MC
J Med Liban; 2008; 56(4):203-7. PubMed ID: 19115593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparison of the effects of colloid and crystalloid solution for volume preloading on maternal hemodynamics and neonatal outcome in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section].
Yokoyama N; Nishikawa K; Saito Y; Saito S; Goto F
Masui; 2004 Sep; 53(9):1019-24. PubMed ID: 15500103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of three fluid regimens for preloading in elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia.
Hasan AB; Mondal MK; Badruddoza NM; Bhowmick DK; Islam MS; Akhtaruzzaman KM; Islam MM
Mymensingh Med J; 2012 Jul; 21(3):533-40. PubMed ID: 22828556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wrapping of the legs versus phenylephrine for reducing hypotension in parturients having epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section: a prospective, randomized and double-blind study.
Bjørnestad E; Iversen OE; Raeder J
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Oct; 26(10):842-6. PubMed ID: 19617841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Volume preloading is not essential to prevent spinal-induced hypotension at caesarean section.
Jackson R; Reid JA; Thorburn J
Br J Anaesth; 1995 Sep; 75(3):262-5. PubMed ID: 7547039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of prophylactic intramuscular ephedrine in prevention of hypotension during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: a comparative study.
Bhar D; Bharati S; Halder PS; Mondal S; Sarkar M; Jana S
J Indian Med Assoc; 2011 May; 109(5):300-3, 307. PubMed ID: 22187760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of fluid preload (crystalloid or colloid) compared with crystalloid co-load plus ephedrine infusion on hypotension and neonatal outcome during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery.
Gunusen I; Karaman S; Ertugrul V; Firat V
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2010 Jul; 38(4):647-53. PubMed ID: 20715726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of 0.5 L 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus 1 L Ringer's lactate preload on the hemodynamic status of parturients undergoing spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery using arterial pulse contour analysis.
Matsota P; Karakosta A; Pandazi A; Niokou D; Christodoulaki K; Kostopanagiotou G
J Anesth; 2015 Jun; 29(3):352-359. PubMed ID: 25266794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of crystalloid and colloid preloading on uteroplacental and maternal haemodynamic state during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.
Karinen J; Räsänen J; Alahuhta S; Jouppila R; Jouppila P
Br J Anaesth; 1995 Nov; 75(5):531-5. PubMed ID: 7577275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prevention of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: dextran 40 versus lactated Ringer's solution.
Lin CS; Lin TY; Huang CH; Lin YH; Lin CR; Chan WH; Tsai SK
Acta Anaesthesiol Sin; 1999 Jun; 37(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 10410403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Compression stockings as prevention of hypotension in Cesarean section during spinal anesthesia].
Jørgensen J; Christensen PK; Sonnenschein CH
Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Mar; 158(11):1526-9. PubMed ID: 8644400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized trial comparing low-dose combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and conventional epidural anesthesia for cesarean section in severe preeclampsia.
Berends N; Teunkens A; Vandermeersch E; Van de Velde M
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2005; 56(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 16013660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
