These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20058856)

  • 1. Alignment-free ultra-high-throughput comparison of druggable protein-ligand binding sites.
    Weill N; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jan; 50(1):123-35. PubMed ID: 20058856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-throughput virtual screening of proteins using GRID molecular interaction fields.
    Sciabola S; Stanton RV; Mills JE; Flocco MM; Baroni M; Cruciani G; Perruccio F; Mason JS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jan; 50(1):155-69. PubMed ID: 19919042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A simple and fuzzy method to align and compare druggable ligand-binding sites.
    Schalon C; Surgand JS; Kellenberger E; Rognan D
    Proteins; 2008 Jun; 71(4):1755-78. PubMed ID: 18175308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. sc-PDB: an annotated database of druggable binding sites from the Protein Data Bank.
    Kellenberger E; Muller P; Schalon C; Bret G; Foata N; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):717-27. PubMed ID: 16563002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding and predicting druggability. A high-throughput method for detection of drug binding sites.
    Schmidtke P; Barril X
    J Med Chem; 2010 Aug; 53(15):5858-67. PubMed ID: 20684613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of 3D atomic similarities and their use in the discrimination of small molecule protein-binding sites.
    Najmanovich R; Kurbatova N; Thornton J
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(16):i105-11. PubMed ID: 18689810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison and druggability prediction of protein-ligand binding sites from pharmacophore-annotated cavity shapes.
    Desaphy J; Azdimousa K; Kellenberger E; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Aug; 52(8):2287-99. PubMed ID: 22834646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of protein active site structures for functional annotation of proteins and drug design.
    Powers R; Copeland JC; Germer K; Mercier KA; Ramanathan V; Revesz P
    Proteins; 2006 Oct; 65(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 16862592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Domain-based small molecule binding site annotation.
    Snyder KA; Feldman HJ; Dumontier M; Salama JJ; Hogue CW
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 7():152. PubMed ID: 16545112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A method to detect important residues using protein binding site comparison.
    Park K; Kim D
    Genome Inform; 2006; 17(2):216-25. PubMed ID: 17503394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficient virtual screening using multiple protein conformations described as negative images of the ligand-binding site.
    Virtanen SI; Pentikäinen OT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jun; 50(6):1005-11. PubMed ID: 20504004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ranking targets in structure-based virtual screening of three-dimensional protein libraries: methods and problems.
    Kellenberger E; Foata N; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1014-25. PubMed ID: 18412328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. BSAlign: a rapid graph-based algorithm for detecting ligand-binding sites in protein structures.
    Aung Z; Tong JC
    Genome Inform; 2008; 21():65-76. PubMed ID: 19425148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Method for comparing the structures of protein ligand-binding sites and application for predicting protein-drug interactions.
    Minai R; Matsuo Y; Onuki H; Hirota H
    Proteins; 2008 Jul; 72(1):367-81. PubMed ID: 18214952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bridging chemical and biological space: "target fishing" using 2D and 3D molecular descriptors.
    Nettles JH; Jenkins JL; Bender A; Deng Z; Davies JW; Glick M
    J Med Chem; 2006 Nov; 49(23):6802-10. PubMed ID: 17154510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Similarity metrics for ligands reflecting the similarity of the target proteins.
    Schuffenhauer A; Floersheim P; Acklin P; Jacoby E
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(2):391-405. PubMed ID: 12653501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. HierVLS hierarchical docking protocol for virtual ligand screening of large-molecule databases.
    Floriano WB; Vaidehi N; Zamanakos G; Goddard WA
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(1):56-71. PubMed ID: 14695820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PDB-Ligand: a ligand database based on PDB for the automated and customized classification of ligand-binding structures.
    Shin JM; Cho DH
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2005 Jan; 33(Database issue):D238-41. PubMed ID: 15608186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recognition templates for predicting adenylate-binding sites in proteins.
    Zhao S; Morris GM; Olson AJ; Goodsell DS
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Dec; 314(5):1245-55. PubMed ID: 11743737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis and prediction of functional sub-types from protein sequence alignments.
    Hannenhalli SS; Russell RB
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Oct; 303(1):61-76. PubMed ID: 11021970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.