BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20058856)

  • 1. Alignment-free ultra-high-throughput comparison of druggable protein-ligand binding sites.
    Weill N; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jan; 50(1):123-35. PubMed ID: 20058856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-throughput virtual screening of proteins using GRID molecular interaction fields.
    Sciabola S; Stanton RV; Mills JE; Flocco MM; Baroni M; Cruciani G; Perruccio F; Mason JS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jan; 50(1):155-69. PubMed ID: 19919042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A simple and fuzzy method to align and compare druggable ligand-binding sites.
    Schalon C; Surgand JS; Kellenberger E; Rognan D
    Proteins; 2008 Jun; 71(4):1755-78. PubMed ID: 18175308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. sc-PDB: an annotated database of druggable binding sites from the Protein Data Bank.
    Kellenberger E; Muller P; Schalon C; Bret G; Foata N; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):717-27. PubMed ID: 16563002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding and predicting druggability. A high-throughput method for detection of drug binding sites.
    Schmidtke P; Barril X
    J Med Chem; 2010 Aug; 53(15):5858-67. PubMed ID: 20684613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of 3D atomic similarities and their use in the discrimination of small molecule protein-binding sites.
    Najmanovich R; Kurbatova N; Thornton J
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(16):i105-11. PubMed ID: 18689810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison and druggability prediction of protein-ligand binding sites from pharmacophore-annotated cavity shapes.
    Desaphy J; Azdimousa K; Kellenberger E; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Aug; 52(8):2287-99. PubMed ID: 22834646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of protein active site structures for functional annotation of proteins and drug design.
    Powers R; Copeland JC; Germer K; Mercier KA; Ramanathan V; Revesz P
    Proteins; 2006 Oct; 65(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 16862592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Domain-based small molecule binding site annotation.
    Snyder KA; Feldman HJ; Dumontier M; Salama JJ; Hogue CW
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 7():152. PubMed ID: 16545112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A method to detect important residues using protein binding site comparison.
    Park K; Kim D
    Genome Inform; 2006; 17(2):216-25. PubMed ID: 17503394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficient virtual screening using multiple protein conformations described as negative images of the ligand-binding site.
    Virtanen SI; Pentikäinen OT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jun; 50(6):1005-11. PubMed ID: 20504004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ranking targets in structure-based virtual screening of three-dimensional protein libraries: methods and problems.
    Kellenberger E; Foata N; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1014-25. PubMed ID: 18412328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. BSAlign: a rapid graph-based algorithm for detecting ligand-binding sites in protein structures.
    Aung Z; Tong JC
    Genome Inform; 2008; 21():65-76. PubMed ID: 19425148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Method for comparing the structures of protein ligand-binding sites and application for predicting protein-drug interactions.
    Minai R; Matsuo Y; Onuki H; Hirota H
    Proteins; 2008 Jul; 72(1):367-81. PubMed ID: 18214952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bridging chemical and biological space: "target fishing" using 2D and 3D molecular descriptors.
    Nettles JH; Jenkins JL; Bender A; Deng Z; Davies JW; Glick M
    J Med Chem; 2006 Nov; 49(23):6802-10. PubMed ID: 17154510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Similarity metrics for ligands reflecting the similarity of the target proteins.
    Schuffenhauer A; Floersheim P; Acklin P; Jacoby E
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(2):391-405. PubMed ID: 12653501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. HierVLS hierarchical docking protocol for virtual ligand screening of large-molecule databases.
    Floriano WB; Vaidehi N; Zamanakos G; Goddard WA
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(1):56-71. PubMed ID: 14695820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PDB-Ligand: a ligand database based on PDB for the automated and customized classification of ligand-binding structures.
    Shin JM; Cho DH
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2005 Jan; 33(Database issue):D238-41. PubMed ID: 15608186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recognition templates for predicting adenylate-binding sites in proteins.
    Zhao S; Morris GM; Olson AJ; Goodsell DS
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Dec; 314(5):1245-55. PubMed ID: 11743737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis and prediction of functional sub-types from protein sequence alignments.
    Hannenhalli SS; Russell RB
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Oct; 303(1):61-76. PubMed ID: 11021970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.