These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

56 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20058943)

  • 1. Post-transient shifts in auditory lateralization: effects of target level.
    Arieh Y; Marks LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 20058943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Posttransient shifts in auditory lateralization.
    Arieh Y; Marks LE
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 May; 69(4):523-8. PubMed ID: 17727105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intensity changes in a continuous tone: auditory cortical potentials comparison with frequency changes.
    Dimitrijevic A; Lolli B; Michalewski HJ; Pratt H; Zeng FG; Starr A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Feb; 120(2):374-83. PubMed ID: 19112047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cortical responses to the 2f1-f2 combination tone measured indirectly using magnetoencephalography.
    Purcell DW; Ross B; Picton TW; Pantev C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):992-1003. PubMed ID: 17672647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Human auditory steady state responses to binaural and monaural beats.
    Schwarz DW; Taylor P
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Mar; 116(3):658-68. PubMed ID: 15721080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Asymmetric cochlear processing mimics hemispheric specialization.
    Sininger YS; Cone-Wesson B
    Science; 2004 Sep; 305(5690):1581. PubMed ID: 15361617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency and intensity effects on ear dominance for tone bursts.
    Leek MR; Brandt JF
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 7187913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relative influence of interaural time and intensity differences on lateralization is modulated by attention to one or the other cue: 500-Hz sine tones.
    Lang AG; Buchner A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2536-42. PubMed ID: 19894833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative study of fixed time versus intensity trade and fixed intensity versus time trade tests in sound lateralization.
    Dekio-Hotta S; Kaga K
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2006 Sep; 33(3):265-9. PubMed ID: 16431062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Masking with interaurally "double-delayed" stimuli: the range of internal delays in the human brain.
    Marquardt T; McAlpine D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):EL177-82. PubMed ID: 20000891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Verbal dichotic listening in developmental stuttering: subgroups with atypical auditory processing.
    Foundas AL; Corey DM; Hurley MM; Heilman KM
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2004 Dec; 17(4):224-32. PubMed ID: 15622019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory location in the irrelevant sound effect: The effects of presenting auditory stimuli to either the left ear, right ear or both ears.
    Hadlington L; Bridges AM; Darby RJ
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Aug; 55(3):545-57. PubMed ID: 15223201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Top-down and bottom-up interaction: manipulating the dichotic listening ear advantage.
    Westerhausen R; Moosmann M; Alho K; Medvedev S; Hämäläinen H; Hugdahl K
    Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1250():183-9. PubMed ID: 19028471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Late auditory evoked potentials asymmetry revisited.
    Hine J; Debener S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jun; 118(6):1274-85. PubMed ID: 17462945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Level dependence in behavioral measurements of auditory-filter phase characteristics.
    Shen Y; Lentz JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2501-10. PubMed ID: 19894830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lateralization of Huggins pitch.
    Zhang PX; Hartmann WM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3873-87. PubMed ID: 19206813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory evoked field at threshold.
    Lütkenhöner B; Klein JS
    Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):188-200. PubMed ID: 17434696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficient stimuli for evoking auditory steady-state responses.
    John MS; Dimitrijevic A; Picton TW
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):406-23. PubMed ID: 14534411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of stimulus intensity on the right ear advantage in dichotic listening.
    Hugdahl K; Westerhausen R; Alho K; Medvedev S; Hämäläinen H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jan; 431(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 18162310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech versus tone processing in compensated dyslexia: discrimination and lateralization with a dichotic mismatch negativity (MMN) paradigm.
    Sebastian C; Yasin I
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Nov; 70(2):115-26. PubMed ID: 18801392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.